Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rusty0604

Not armed with a gun anyway. The law says that using a vehicle to inflict serious bodily harm qualifies as assault with a deadly weapon. The driver was armed under the law.

(I make no assertions about whether or not the officers used justifiable force or should have been granted qualified immunity.)


65 posted on 05/27/2014 10:39:46 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
Not armed with a gun anyway. The law says that using a vehicle to inflict serious bodily harm qualifies as assault with a deadly weapon. The driver was armed under the law.

But that didn't happen, did it???

108 posted on 05/27/2014 12:21:55 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson