My favorite climate change question is :
Does the historical data indicate that an increase in atmospheric temperature followed an increase in atmospheric CO2
Or
Does the historical data indicate that an increase in atmospheric temperature preceded an increase in atmospheric CO2?
What would be the point of answering other questions on the subject before an answer to this question is learned.
Even though their own propaganda shows the fallacy of their beliefs, they still believe.
{They aren't smart enough to decipher the graph”
My favorite has become:
Where is the ‘control’ sample?
If you are going to saw an event is caused by something, you have to have a “control” sample that doesn’t have that something to test it against.
Otherwise it is all speculation.
Of course with algore speculating in the carbon market that would make sense!