Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Wrote Susan Rice's Talking Points, This Time?
Breitbart ^ | 2 Jun 2014 | by DEBRA HEINE

Posted on 06/04/2014 9:21:55 AM PDT by Resettozero

In response to The White House doubles its bet on some bad cards: For no other reason other than morbid curiosity, I'd like to know who wrote the talking points for Susan Rice's appearances on the Sunday talk shows, yesterday. It's not like she had any more credibility to lose, but Rice told some whoppers, yesterday, possibly as Allahpundit notes at Hot Air, in a calculated attempt to set a false narrative, as "most voters will pay attention to this story for 48 hours after Bergdahl’s release and then tune out." Even as the truth was gushing out about the deserter, Bergdahl, Susan Rice was on ABC News telling George Stephanopoulos that he was captured "on the battlefield" and that he had "served with honor and distinction." As Ace quipped, Susan Rice, like Ron Burgundy, will literally read whatever is put on a card in front of her. Bill Kristol asked some good questions, today, on Morning Joe: “Those are the people who fought, who fought in the same company in some cases, and who feel like they sacrificed to get this guy back who may have behaved at best irresponsibly and at worst worse. And we need to have honesty about that. There was a big Army investigation–what did Susan Rice know? What did President Obama know about the investigation about Bergdahl? “It’s one thing to trade terrorists for a real POW, someone who was taken on the battlefield fighting honorably for our country. It’s another thing to trade away 5 high-ranking terrorists to someone who walked away.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bergdahl; liar; rice; susanrice
Pukey video of Rice and Steponallofus at link. (Several days old but did not find this article posted yet.)
1 posted on 06/04/2014 9:21:55 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
In response to The White House doubles its bet on some bad cards: For no other reason other than morbid curiosity, I'd like to know who wrote the talking points for Susan Rice's appearances on the Sunday talk shows, yesterday.

It's not like she had any more credibility to lose, but Rice told some whoppers, yesterday, possibly as Allahpundit notes at Hot Air, in a calculated attempt to set a false narrative, as "most voters will pay attention to this story for 48 hours after Bergdahl’s release and then tune out."

Even as the truth was gushing out about the deserter, Bergdahl, Susan Rice was on ABC News telling George Stephanopoulos that he was captured "on the battlefield" and that he had "served with honor and distinction." As Ace quipped, Susan Rice, like Ron Burgundy, will literally read whatever is put on a card in front of her.

Bill Kristol asked some good questions, today, on Morning Joe: “Those are the people who fought, who fought in the same company in some cases, and who feel like they sacrificed to get this guy back who may have behaved at best irresponsibly and at worst worse. And we need to have honesty about that.

There was a big Army investigation–what did Susan Rice know? What did President Obama know about the investigation about Bergdahl? “It’s one thing to trade terrorists for a real POW, someone who was taken on the battlefield fighting honorably for our country. It’s another thing to trade away 5 high-ranking terrorists to someone who walked away.”
2 posted on 06/04/2014 9:24:08 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

She is shameless with the ease that she repeats the lies hanged to her to repeat on TV.

A real independent media would be all over her for it, they have no shame either.


3 posted on 06/04/2014 9:43:30 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

How can one characterize Rice’s default facial expression? There’s like a sad, shamed look to it, like a dog that’s been caught chewing up a shoe. Worried? Evil? How can it be described?


4 posted on 06/04/2014 9:52:52 AM PDT by duckworth (Perhaps instant karma's going to get you. Perhaps not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

I think Samantha Power is behind this sock puppet, or at least was, while they were at the UN

Now that Rice speaks for the man behind the screen and probably has to submit written requests to see him, I would assume General ValJar is maintaining a tight grip on the “public narrative” and running the country


5 posted on 06/04/2014 9:57:23 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Now that Rice speaks for the man behind the screen and probably has to submit written requests to see him, I would assume General ValJar is maintaining a tight grip on the “public narrative” and running the country.

With the aid (until today anyway) of Hitlary's Media Matters talking points distributed to all good media boys and girls.
6 posted on 06/04/2014 10:03:28 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

President Jarret?


7 posted on 06/04/2014 10:06:27 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
President Jarrett?

Yes. Who shall I say is calling her?
8 posted on 06/04/2014 10:10:58 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Ms. Rice cannot seem to keep her foot out of her mouth.

She is CLEARLY not suited for Sunday Morning Talk Shows. She should probably never make any public statements, ever.


9 posted on 06/04/2014 10:24:49 AM PDT by Mr. Quarterpanel (I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Obvious to me why they put her out there again. She is already damaged from Behghazi. Nothing to lose by compounding the damage caused by her statements on Bergdahl.


10 posted on 06/04/2014 10:27:43 AM PDT by CityCenter (Resist Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Quarterpanel
She is CLEARLY not suited for Sunday Morning Talk Shows. She should probably never make any public statements, ever.

I agree. They should stuff her in some out-of-the-way office job as, say, Ambassador to the UN or National Security Advisor. Couldn't do the Administration much harm then?
11 posted on 06/04/2014 10:28:33 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

He served “with honor and distinction” for which side? For such rabid anti-Americans, that was likely a completely accurate statement.


12 posted on 06/04/2014 11:39:46 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

bkmk


13 posted on 06/04/2014 11:45:06 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afsnco
He served “with honor and distinction” for which side? For such rabid anti-Americans, that was likely a completely accurate statement.

Like I've said...

Our enemies in the highest places are openly hiding in plain sight, telegraphing exactly where they stand on EVERY matter.

Non-FReepers just aren't willing to believe what is plainly visible and audible!
14 posted on 06/04/2014 11:46:08 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Susan Rice is supposed to be an intelligent woman who has a large role in setting our foreign policy. NOBODY should be writing her talking points. She should be evaluating her information and deciding how to respond to reporters' questions.

We have to assume either she's writing what she says or that she's a total incompetent.

15 posted on 06/04/2014 11:49:09 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania
We have to assume either she's writing what she says or that she's a total incompetent.

...or is a lying' skank.
16 posted on 06/04/2014 11:54:28 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: grania

Or another option, she is an Islamic infiltrator placed in the WH to control the narrative, and at all cost protect the cause.


17 posted on 06/04/2014 12:00:27 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

LOL!!!

That would be a good place....She couldn’t get into trouble there...

...Wait...Never mind.


18 posted on 06/05/2014 5:00:23 AM PDT by Mr. Quarterpanel (I am not an actor, but I play one on TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson