[SoConPubbie]

How many barfs does Hillary 2016...or Princess Liawatha 2016...or Deval “Coupe Deval” Patrick 2016 get?

More than Mitt, but I ain't playing the "Lesser of Two Evil" games anymore.

I will not vote for anyone that supports Abortion, the Gay Agenda and who hasn't a clue where limited government is concerned.

Romney fails on all three.

I correctly stated early on in the primaries in 2012 that Mitt Romney was the least likely GOP candidate to win in the General Election; I can safely say, that the same thing and know that this time, it is even more true.

[arderkrag]

Same here. I hate the lesser of two evils argument. Lesser of two evils will not get my vote.

[IWONDR]

“I correctly stated early on in the primaries in 2012 that Mitt Romney was the least likely GOP candidate to win in the General Election; I can safely say, that the same thing and know that this time, it is even more true.”

you are certainly correct for 2016. Hillary will be the next president, unless the MSM gives up on supporting her sorry excuse for a candidacy based on her “experience,” “qualifications,” and support for women’s rights. the only women’s right she has ever really supported is one with the last name of Clinton.

[cynwoody]

I correctly stated early on in the primaries in 2012 that Mitt Romney was the least likely GOP candidate to win in the General Election; I can safely say, that the same thing and know that this time, it is even more true.

It would be a crying shame to waste what 2016 is shaping up to be on the likes of Mittens.

Romney's problem is, conservatism is not his native language. It's a dialect he needs to adopt to win nominations and elections (except when he doesn't). But it is not what he understands and believes!

Romney is a technocrat who accepts the existing order and tries to improve upon it incrementally. That's not exciting (which is why he loses elections). More important, it's not what the country needs!