--the usual garbage from the Madistan bird cage liner---
To: rellimpank
So they are still going after private sales eh
2 posted on
06/16/2014 5:12:06 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: rellimpank
...as well as most NRA members... When did the communist libs start speaking for "most NRA members"?
3 posted on
06/16/2014 5:12:44 AM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
To: rellimpank
Here’s an idea, if the current background checks aren’t working then lets do away with them.
Save the money for mental health treatment.
4 posted on
06/16/2014 5:13:23 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: rellimpank
A glaring loophole allows allows people to meet and exchange drugs for money, which could be prevented by requiring police presence at all gatherings of two or more people. Another glaring loophole allows people to publish whatever they want (subject to only a few restrictions) without first obtaining government approval for the material.
5 posted on
06/16/2014 5:16:12 AM PDT by
coloradan
(The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
To: rellimpank
Why is the SERIAL NUMBER and MODEL NUMBER needed for a background check? It seems to me that you should ONLY check the person and be done with it. Nothing is gained with serial and model numbers,UNLESS someone is trying to build up a database for later confiscation (which, of course, our government denies they want to do)
6 posted on
06/16/2014 5:17:02 AM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: rellimpank
“to stop more than 1,000 criminals annually from buying weapons.”
1. False — if the preamble is even accurate, it only stopped them from buying firearms legally. Illegal firearms, knives, cars still easily obtained.
2. And what was done to the 1,000 “criminals”? How many were arrested? Prosecuted? Convicted/Jailed? Probation/parole revoked? Can we guess few or none? Maybe start with enforcing laws that exist.
To: rellimpank
Remember when Gabby Gifford's husband tried to but a gun with a falsified application?
See: http://theweek.com/article/index/241866/why-gabby-giffords-husband-tried-mdash-and-failed-mdash-to-buy-a-gun#axzz34nu43grv
I have not heard of any subsequent prosecution for filing a false affidavit!
To: rellimpank
... sensible ...Every time I see "common sence" and "sensible" in relation to firearms I know that the author is a full blown statist, freedom hating, government worshiping, bed wetting, anti-gun fanatic. Anti-gunners don't believe in limited government. They worship government and limiting its powers is the equivalent of blasphemy to them.
Anti gunners cannot be bargained with - they have nothing to offer. They cannot be reasoned with - their hatred of guns outside the hands of the government's JBTs is NOT based on reason, but on their faith in government; it's a religious thing with them not a reasoned position.
Anti-gunners don't feel pity - your family killed by home invaders because you were disarmed? Not a problem as long as no police were hurt.
Anti-gunners don't feel remorse. To the contrary, when they've managed to pass a restriction on our rights they feel briefly elation, but then like a serial murderer the high passes and they look for the next incremental step to enslaving us.
Anti-gunners don't feel fear because they have nothing to fear. If their legislation doesn't pass, so what? They haven't lost anything. In fact if all gun control were rescinded today they wouldn't have lost anything. And since we gun owners are law abiding, they don't have to fear getting their doors kicked in in the night and being killed for their beliefs, unlike what they'd like their JBTs to do to us.
And finally they never quit. They're constantly working to destroy our rights and enslave us. You can't appease them they're relentless. There are only three possible end states
- They win and our rights are stripped and we are slave of the totalitarian police state that they tireless work to achieve
- We are killed by their JBTs "resisting arrest"
- We kill enough of them and their goons that the problem is put off for a generation or so. (this was the 1776 solution)
9 posted on
06/16/2014 5:27:11 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: rellimpank
They use “gun show loophole” like Democrats and GOPe uses “immigration reform” for Amnesty.
Once broken down into the real components, neither are true.
10 posted on
06/16/2014 5:28:54 AM PDT by
Gaffer
To: afraidfortherepublic
12 posted on
06/16/2014 5:34:57 AM PDT by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: rellimpank
Consistent gun checks a smart, simple step (barf alert)Let's have a chat after an ID is required to vote in any election in the US.
13 posted on
06/16/2014 5:39:05 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: rellimpank
Liberals label all their ideas “smart” because otherwise you wouldn’t know it.
14 posted on
06/16/2014 5:43:00 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: rellimpank
Here's an idea: a hard-to-remove RFID surgically-implanted in convicted felons as a condition of parole, which can identify him as a felon to any police officer at a distance.
Any police officer coming upon such a felon having the right to search the felon for weapons. Any two felons found in each other's company are immediately arrested for parole violation.
16 posted on
06/16/2014 5:54:39 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: rellimpank
As a newspaper that is protected by the First Amendment, calling for restrictions in violation of the Second Amendment for a "smart, simple step" to reduce shocking gun violence causes me to suggest that the Wisconsin State Journal would be for smart, simple restrictions that can be placed on the press (TV, radio, newspaper, magazines, and so forth) and on burial facilities (including churches) to help reduce gun violence. They are:
- Names of the suspects will not be released until they are convicted, sentenced, and jailed. Why else would these people go on rampages except to get their 15 minutes of fame?
- Those perps that are killed before trial shall be required to be buried in unmarked graves, or placed in urns that are not on any form of public display
- Reporters, editors, anchors, columnists, and news show producers shall be fingerprinted, background checks performed, and be required to pay for a registration card, renewed every two years.
After all, isn't the pen mightier than the sword?
24 posted on
06/16/2014 8:15:04 AM PDT by
asinclair
(Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson