[Georgia Girl 2]

The Supreme Court is just as worthless as the rest of our government.

[all the best]

The EPA lacks authority to enact law. Regulations are rules that come with penalties. Sounds like laws to me. Laws are the job of the legislative branch.

[txrefugee]

We should have abolished the SCOTUS during the Warren Court. Think how much better off we would be.

[FlingWingFlyer]

It looks like Americans are going to have to continue fighting the EPA to get them off of our backs. The Bill of Rights and the Constitution just aren’t working since the Obama regime came to power.

[1010RD]

What’s that mean?

[DariusBane]

“Carbon dioxide is the chief gas linked to global warming.”

Is this an editorial or is it news?

[theBuckwheat]

The Declaration of Independence and Constitution were written with the PRESUMPTION OF LIBERTY that is the inalienable right of each citizen

Government acts with the presumption of total power over each citizen. It is easy for one branch of government to give itself other branches permission to expand or maintain their power. It is difficult, indeed a conflict of interest, for one branch to reign in the power of another branch. This is made even more difficult when a common, power-oriented, ideology pervades members of each branch.

The primary limit on government power is the limited money it can spend. When government gives itself power to create near-infinite amounts of money through an “independent” central bank, then there is very little to limit near-infinite amounts of government in all forms, particularly the groups that it will give subsidies to and the bureaucrats it will employ.

Both constituencies will make their own unique demands on government.

Every day more people are coming to the judgment that a carefully organized effort to repair the constitution via the States’ power to propose and ratify amendments has less risk to our liberty and prosperity than the present trajectory of the federal government and especially the federal bureaucracy.

The first order of business of an Article V Convention must be to limit government’s ability to spend and create near-infinite amounts of money.

[Lurking Libertarian]

SCOTUS ping.

[A Navy Vet]

"The justices said that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks authority in some cases to force companies to evaluate ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. This rule applies when a company needs a permit to expand facilities or build new ones that would increase overall pollution."

Is this not a good ruling by putting restrictions on the EPA? What am I missing, beside the ruling not including all companies?