Turley or Hannity said that there is a paragraph in the 100 page decision that is most relavant It states EO are not to be used to supervene the other points —the power of the presidency can not be used to deminish the powers of another branch of the government ( am paraphrasing)
We need to find that paragraph and give it the most publicity as we can!
Our decision in Chadha illustrates that principle. There, we held that a statutory provision authorizing one House of Congress to cancel an executive action taken pursuant to statutory authority—a so-called “legislative veto”—exceeded the bounds of Congress’s authority under the Constitution. 462 U. S., at 957–959. We did not hesi tate to hold the legislative veto unconstitutional even though Congress had enacted, and the President had signed, nearly 300 similar provisions over the course of 50 years. Id., at 944–945. Just the opposite: We said the other branches’ enthusiasm for the legislative veto “sharp ened rather than blunted” our review. Id., at 944. Like wise, when the charge is made that a practice “enhances the President’s powers beyond” what the Constitution permits, “[i]t is no answer . . . to say that Congress sur rendered its authority by its own hand.”
bttt