1 posted on
06/29/2014 11:31:16 AM PDT by
PoloSec
To: PoloSec
The Weekly Standard is conservative?? Who know????!
2 posted on
06/29/2014 11:34:15 AM PDT by
Ken522
To: PoloSec
The libs cannot let any blame rest on Obozo.
But he owns this flustercluck COMPLETELY.
4 posted on
06/29/2014 11:37:44 AM PDT by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: PoloSec
Katrina was a bitch from the get go on the program. I wanted to stuff an apple in her mouth. She kept “lecturing” the rest of the panel in the same way bammy thinks he’s schooling the country when he opens his piehole.
5 posted on
06/29/2014 11:38:17 AM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: PoloSec
And Katrina along with her magazine is a defender of communism which has wrecked, destroyed and killed literally millions of people.
To: PoloSec
A liberal talking about accountability. That’s a laugher.
To: PoloSec
Iraq war defenders never mention the Kurds , whom Sadaam gassed by the 10’s of thousands, and now form the one stable area in the entire region. Strange not to counter punch with that fact.
8 posted on
06/29/2014 11:45:35 AM PDT by
gusopol3
To: PoloSec
It’s always hilarious when a liberal uses the word ‘accountability’ because they don’t even know the meaning of the word.
10 posted on
06/29/2014 11:56:22 AM PDT by
Bullish
(You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
To: PoloSec
Katrina: if you feel so strongly, go to Iraq and hand out Daisies to ISIS.
12 posted on
06/29/2014 11:59:39 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: PoloSec
If You Feel So Strongly...Enlist In The Iraqi Army Rebuttal, "And if you care so much for the poor give all your possessions to them. " Actually, since Jesus did suggest that to one young man, it's a lot more to the point.
14 posted on
06/29/2014 12:05:10 PM PDT by
gusopol3
To: PoloSec
Bill Kristol’s credibility was exhausted years ago. He should hide his face for shame.
15 posted on
06/29/2014 12:08:39 PM PDT by
Romulus
To: PoloSec
What a brilliant retort from the hatchet-faced heiress zany Marxist tycoon.
To: PoloSec
If Katrina feels that strongly, she should enlist with her side, ISIS.
22 posted on
06/29/2014 1:01:50 PM PDT by
RichInOC
("In the name of Allah, The Inexorable, The Irresistible...")
To: PoloSec
So using her own reasoning, Ms. V.D. Heuvel could be called an "armchair abortion rights advocate", right? (At least, I am assuming that she has never either performed or undergone an abortion, but I could be wrong).
I would love to see a comeback like that anytime someone uses the ridiculous phrase "armchair warrior". And yes, it is ridiculous, since being a "warrior" is not something which someone just wakes up one day and decides to do. It is a calling and a commitment, no less than deciding to become a doctor because you either want to heal the sick, deliver babies, or, perhaps, provide give women abortions.
So, Ms. V.D. Heuvel, with all due respect (another ludicrous phrase because what follows is always disrespectful and degrading), if you feel so strongly about abortion rights, then why didn't you enroll a long time ago into a medical school so that you could help women to terminate the lives of their unborn children?
Clearly, not everyone has what it takes to be a warrior or a doctor. And the arguments put forth from people like either Kristol and V.D. Heuvel, who have chosen to be media talking heads, need not be supported by calling upon them to make a mid-life career change. For anyone to suggest otherwise is simply inane, and the absurdity of that line of reasoning should be simply called out by putting the shoe on the other foot. Whether we're arguing over war, abortion, labor, immigration. or any other issues, it is simply ridiculous to suggest that those who, by profession, communicate their analysis and opinions o those matters, must defend their conclusions by giving up their career and getting into the trenches with those who are most involved. Like Milton Friedman once said, if you go to a doctor for cancer, would you require that it be a doctor who has cancer?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson