|
This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
|
Locked on 06/30/2014 4:29:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childish behavior
|
Skip to comments.
Supreme Court: Closely held companies can’t be required to cover contraceptives
Catholic Review ^
| 6/30/14
| Patricia Zapor
Posted on 06/30/2014 3:21:29 PM PDT by Welchie25
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
06/30/2014 3:21:29 PM PDT
by
Welchie25
To: Welchie25
I guess the Liberal Messiah wasn’t able to bribe/extort the Chief Justice this time.
2
posted on
06/30/2014 3:24:05 PM PDT
by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: humblegunner
4
posted on
06/30/2014 3:29:51 PM PDT
by
lastchance
("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
To: Welchie25
IMO the religious entities should have a stronger case than a for profit company.
5
posted on
06/30/2014 3:37:21 PM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(Liberals were raised by women or wimps.)
To: Welchie25
It’s abortion that won’t be covered. The left’s baby killing trumps all. Fascists.
6
posted on
06/30/2014 3:38:39 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: lastchance
Ignore the troll. Worst poster on FR, bar none.
7
posted on
06/30/2014 3:43:45 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: lastchance
What is wrong with you? I'm not the one posting excerpts from a single source and redirecting traffic.
To: VRWC For Truth
Worst poster on FR, bar none. Yes, but maybe that pimp will knock it off. We can only hope.
To: Welchie25
The court has now invented out of thin air
a new class of business that are “closely held companies”
just like they invented the class of “providing public accommodation”.
10
posted on
06/30/2014 3:49:09 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Under pressure, they sliced a baby.
11
posted on
06/30/2014 3:49:40 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: humblegunner
I wish proudgunners would shut up.
12
posted on
06/30/2014 3:50:16 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Repeal The 17th
Anyhow, what would a distantly held company be?
13
posted on
06/30/2014 3:51:24 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: Repeal The 17th
And more importantly, not defined what closely held company actually means.
14
posted on
06/30/2014 3:51:43 PM PDT
by
Fuzz
To: HiTech RedNeck
I wish proudgunners would shut up. Sorry about that. Have you a tissue into which you might weep?
To: HiTech RedNeck
Worst poster on FR, bar NONE. Flaming a-hat.
16
posted on
06/30/2014 4:00:09 PM PDT
by
VRWC For Truth
(Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
To: humblegunner
You are close to becoming a snotrag yourself.
17
posted on
06/30/2014 4:01:32 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: VRWC For Truth
Gratuitous nuisance monger.
18
posted on
06/30/2014 4:02:10 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
You are close to becoming a snotrag yourself. So is your Mom but I'm polite enough not to mention it.
To: VRWC For Truth
Worst poster on FR, bar NONE. Maybe you should do something about it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson