To: Viennacon
Why would the reverend implicate himself? Evidence of vote fraud usually doesn’t present itself so clearly and openly. This smells funny.
64 posted on
06/30/2014 7:18:28 PM PDT by
virgil
(The evil that men do lives after them)
To: virgil
Did the despicable campaign Cochran ran in MS sound fishy to you too?
77 posted on
06/30/2014 7:23:56 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
(True conservatives don't like being pissed on by their own party!)
To: virgil
Why would the reverend implicate himself? Evidence of vote fraud usually doesn’t present itself so clearly and openly. That's a fair question. I do not have a good answer at this point
78 posted on
06/30/2014 7:23:57 PM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: virgil
The only thing I see is that the emails say they are from "SALEEN O BAIRD" on the top. The email address saleem@thadforms.com is correct, however.
100 posted on
06/30/2014 7:31:24 PM PDT by
Mygirlsmom
(Tea: A beverage best served cold. With RINO meat.)
To: virgil
“Why would the reverend implicate himself? Evidence of vote fraud usually doesn’t present itself so clearly and openly. This smells funny.”
Stupidity or he’s looking for a deal. Immunity in exchange for testimony.
113 posted on
06/30/2014 7:38:48 PM PDT by
RKBA Democrat
(Be a part of the American freedom migration: freestateproject.org)
To: virgil
“Why would the reverend implicate himself?”
Maybe he was undercover.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson