Skip to comments.
Darwin's 'Special Difficulty' Solved?
Institute for Creation Research ^
| 7-7-14
| Nathaniel T. Jeanson, Ph.D.
Posted on 07/10/2014 8:44:39 AM PDT by fishtank
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
ICR article image.
1
posted on
07/10/2014 8:44:40 AM PDT
by
fishtank
To: fishtank
Darwin's 'Special Difficulty' Oh, you mean the "special difficulty" that there's NO EVIDENCE of his theory that requires transfer between major animal groups? You mean THAT special difficulty? Yeah, I'd say that was a problem.
That and the unlimited amount of evidence of intelligent design. Woops, another "special problem" for Darwin.
2
posted on
07/10/2014 8:49:28 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: fishtank
Darwin and Huxley handled these “special difficulties” by assassinating the characters of the critics. Evolutionists today follow the same formula for success.
3
posted on
07/10/2014 8:51:50 AM PDT
by
Ethan Clive Osgoode
(<<== Click here to learn about Evolution!)
To: fishtank
Ahhhh the “special difficulty” solved by deus ex machina
4
posted on
07/10/2014 8:52:32 AM PDT
by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: PapaNew
And by the way: It is not “survival of the fittest.” It is “survival of the sufficient”. You only have to be just fast enough, just strong enough, just smart enough, etc. to survive. If the gazelle would evolve to be faster, the cheetahs would go hungry. If the cheetahs would evolve to go faster, they would be prolific and consume their main food source. If they evolved speed together, tit for tat; then they would be supersonic by now.
5
posted on
07/10/2014 8:58:47 AM PDT
by
Revolutionary
("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
To: fishtank
The evolution of the electric organ is easily proven. Here is a photo from it's early stages of development:
6
posted on
07/10/2014 9:00:25 AM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: fishtank
This morning Drudge has an article on
peer review, it's the gateway to grants and funding.
7
posted on
07/10/2014 9:03:48 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: Revolutionary
I don't have to be faster than the bear that's chasing us. I just have to be faster than you... :-)
BTW, creation allows for changes within an animal group. Darwin utterly fails because of no transference between major animal groups.
8
posted on
07/10/2014 9:04:16 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: fishtank
Meanwhile scientists are still finding animals and species and new species they and redeveloping theories. They don’t know what they’re doing.
9
posted on
07/10/2014 9:04:56 AM PDT
by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: fishtank
Convergent evolution. The “electric organ” has also evolved in mammals, see the platypus.
10
posted on
07/10/2014 9:06:22 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: fishtank
Take the anti-science junk somewhere else. This isn’t a fiction site. Damn...
11
posted on
07/10/2014 9:07:17 AM PDT
by
lefty-lie-spy
(Stay metal. For the Horde \m/("_")\m/ - via iPhone from Tokyo.)
To: fishtank
"Evolution" is a lot like "climate change" in that they don't lend well to scientific scrutiny at all. The size/scope of the "laboratory" in which they would have to be tested and the long time lines of these theories makes it impossible to test them under the controlled environments that would be necessary for valid predictive scientific study.
12
posted on
07/10/2014 9:08:32 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
To: fishtank
13
posted on
07/10/2014 9:09:21 AM PDT
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: longfellow
Meanwhile scientists are still finding animals and species and new species they and redeveloping theories. Actually, if you're doing science right, you are constantly reformulating your theories as new data comes in. It is just the opposite of the junk science that the AGW scienticians practice wherein they stick to the computer model blaming SUVs come hell or high - or lack of high - water.
14
posted on
07/10/2014 9:09:41 AM PDT
by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: fishtank
Another reason for commonality between species: common Creator.
To: JimSEA
This crap-science article also ignores the role of spontaneous mutation.
Oh well, it’s crap so why waste words trying to argue with those who won’t be convinced anyway.
16
posted on
07/10/2014 9:12:25 AM PDT
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
17
posted on
07/10/2014 9:13:14 AM PDT
by
John Valentine
(Deep in the Heart of Texas)
To: fishtank
To me the biggest crime committed by the Climate Fraud crowd is that their fraudulent activity muddies the waters on a subject that is actually crystal clear.
Unlike “climate science” — which is a concoction of computer models based on fraudulent “data” — evolution has “evolved” (so to speak) over years and decades and has a very respectable history as a field of science.
It doesn’t mean you have to agree with it, but it’s a shame that the fraud of climate science is used to tar the science of biological evolution as equally fraudulent. It most definitely is not. It’s not fraudulent at all. Not even a little bit. (Even if you disagree with it or feel that inadequate attention is paid to the possibility of divine action at the beginning of life.)
To: cuban leaf
Okay, now.
THAT was funny.
19
posted on
07/10/2014 9:39:09 AM PDT
by
Quality_Not_Quantity
(Liars use facts when the truth doesn't suit their purposes.)
To: Revolutionary
You only have to be just fast enough, just strong enough, just smart enough, etc. to survive. And therefore, monkeys change into chess-masters.
20
posted on
07/10/2014 9:42:38 AM PDT
by
Ethan Clive Osgoode
(<<== Click here to learn about Evolution!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson