[brownsfan]

Pfffft, both parties want this kind of power. They’ll fix it, obamacare isn’t going anywhere, unless it’s an expansion to single payer.

[Tzimisce]

I believe it will survive the next court challenge.

The Ruling Class is tired of being constrained by the Constitution and so they’re going to dump it.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The only goal is to overwhelm the system. That's pretty much a done deal.

[Fair Paul]

I thought if one part of Obamacare wasn’t implemented the entire thing was voided. What happened to that?

[Signalman]

Tribe suggested that the case will, like the individual mandate challenge before it, hinge on Chief Justice John Roberts’s decision.

Will Roberts decide correctly, ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION, this time?

[Talisker]

Tribe suggested that the case will, like the individual mandate challenge before it, hinge on Chief Justice John Roberts’s decision. “He would be asking himself the hard question: ‘Is it so clear under existing law that it has to be construed in this literal and somewhat bizarre way . . . that subsidies or tax credits cannot be provided on the federal exchanges, or is it sufficiently ambiguous that it gives me the necessary legal wiggle room’ [to side with the administration once again?]” Tribe said.

Tribe's so full of it. Robert's ruling was as strict as possible - that strictness MADE his ruling.

[BunnySlippers]

Bookmark