Replies

I have two daughters who will both be able to vote for the first time in 2016 and this fits them to a t. They know that Obama is a miserable failure and they understand why “progressive” economic policies are no good, but they have no problem at all with gay rights issues or marijuana legalization or any of the stuff that tends to get the social conservatives’ panties in a knot.

"...panties in a knot."

Interesting smear by you. Lol, perhaps explaining some reasons such as an attack on religious freedom, abusing natural laws, legalizing a product combined with a dependency cycle in the form of the welfare state which is leading to subsidization through the taxpayer, and many more rational objections or are your panties in a knot, not just your daughters, in that people have objections to societies implosion caused by the sexual revolution.

The future demographics are not pretty thanks to those so blind they think they are socially "enlightened" and superior to Nature's God. Society's stabilization unfortunately does not depend on technology although the quality of life can be enhanced and how a person gets their genitals off; the fundamentals have strict guidelines and when abused, causes all kinds of calamities.

Please read my post again because the contextual aspects are no where near Are you saying that marijuana somehow inevitably and inexorably leads to dependence on government this conclusion.

Natural laws, not that hard to understand just read some Locke along with a Bible. Abuse, not that hard to contemplate over CDC figures (Which are watered down) and resources extracted because responsibility has been relegated to "someone else will just pay for/support/fund it".

"...the homos and their enablers in the government are taking things way, way, WAY too far with the forcing of private businesses to comply with their way of thinking."

Are you this clueless? That is one of the main objectives (Read 'After the Ball' which details the activists game plans) under the approving eyes of moderates, heterosexual sympathizers such as yourself that brush this off and claim people who understand the destructive nature of "free" sex in any orifice will lead to economic hardships for everyone are getting their "panties in a knot" which was your description originally, not your daughters under the context in which you typed.

Do some research, especially on the authors and pick a side because your attempt to claim the middle-ground is disingenuous in the over all scheme of things, because there isn't a pleasant shade of gray in this matter.