I know the stats.
Back in the 60’s and 70’s, they tried to keep a “low profile” as their PR campaign hadn’t begun yet.
How is pointing out what the homos did to keep appearances “helping” them?
If anything, it shows just how sick they really are.
I wasn't talking about that statement. I agree that was true in previous decades. I was talking about the original conjecture on someone else's part that Blitzer was a homo. My contention would be that with today's acceptance of the lifestyle, especially in his profession, a sham marriage would no longer be needed. I therefore would lean more towards the not homo side.