Replies

I know 95% of the people on this forum are going to disagree with me, but McDaniel didn’t stand a chance at reversing the results of this election.

* Fighting for the truth should never be predicated upon the chances of winning. At the start of our Revolution no one would have said we could win.
The fix was in from the top to the bottom.

*All the more reason to fight.

He should have swallowed his pride, accepted the defeat and lived to fight another day. And everyone would have respected him and realized that at the end of the day he was the better man.

*Who would have respected McDaniel as a “better man?” Would that be Nancy Pelosi or Karl Rove or the New York Times? So the victim should allow himself to robbed without a word of protest so the New York Times and the Left and you would “respect” him?

Instead he’s come across as a sore loser and his followers don’t understand the big picture here. We need the senate.

*Now you have shown your true colors. You really don’t care who is or is not a “sore loser.” You care about electing Republicans and American freedoms be damned.

We need the senate. We can purge these rinos over time... and make them vote the right way by the pressure we put on them.

*I see you don’t understand that this battle is between the Washington Uniparty and actual Americans. This election and its aftermath proved that there is just one Party with a Republican and Democrat wing. I’m of the American Party myself and don’t care about old Thad.

The irony of all of this is that there is a growing chance that Obama will poison the well for Democrats so much that the Republican wing of Uniparty will win enough seats without Thad when people support Childers or maybe just maybe if McDaniel wins with a write in which might be illegal under Mississippi law but is legal under superseding federal election laws.