Skip to comments.
Topless Texas protesters troll gun activists
San Antonio Express News ^
| 07/30/2014
| Joshua Fechter
Posted on 07/31/2014 2:37:49 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 last
To: july4thfreedomfoundation
61
posted on
07/31/2014 3:45:54 PM PDT
by
bicyclerepair
(The zombies here elected alcee hastings. TERM LIMITS ... TERM LIMITS)
To: Slings and Arrows
2A SAVE THE TA-TAS...it's a trap!
62
posted on
07/31/2014 3:48:37 PM PDT
by
Daffynition
("We Are Not Descended From Fearful Men")
To: bicyclerepair
63
posted on
07/31/2014 3:51:19 PM PDT
by
mylife
To: Daffynition
I don’t that even Admiral Ackbar would go for these chicks.
64
posted on
07/31/2014 3:56:38 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows
65
posted on
07/31/2014 3:58:10 PM PDT
by
Daffynition
("We Are Not Descended From Fearful Men")
To: faithhopecharity
Babs Streisand water-wings!
66
posted on
07/31/2014 4:23:27 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
To: Oliviaforever
How were these women allowed to do this?It is perfectly legal for women to go topless in Texas. The ones that do, shouldn't.
67
posted on
07/31/2014 4:35:04 PM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
To: Vaquero
The boob on the left goes by the indian name of Hanging Far. The boob is in charge.
68
posted on
07/31/2014 4:45:09 PM PDT
by
Jabba the Nutt
(You can have a free country or government schools. Choose one.)
To: Responsibility2nd
I support open carry. Both kinds. Guns AND boobies!
69
posted on
07/31/2014 4:49:20 PM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Lurking Libertarian
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
By the mere fact that they were topless on the public streets and disrupting an orderly and peaceful assembly by true patriots who have legitimate grievances against the government proves that their disruptive exercise was not peaceful.
To: Responsibility2nd
Keep yer shoit on lady!
71
posted on
07/31/2014 5:34:22 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Responsibility2nd
The answer is simple.
Blow their heads off.
72
posted on
07/31/2014 6:26:08 PM PDT
by
mkleesma
(`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
To: Slings and Arrows; GeronL
So lemme get this straight, the same group who are looking to ban guns also want to ban the bra?
Interesting.
73
posted on
07/31/2014 7:06:02 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Elian Gonzalez sought asylum and was sent back to Cuba, send these kids back to THEIR parents.)
To: Responsibility2nd
The women carried signs that read, "You realize that everyone thinks you're overcompensating for your teeny tiny 'gun' right? I think the 'gun' recoiled in fear when presented with that image.
74
posted on
07/31/2014 7:07:28 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Elian Gonzalez sought asylum and was sent back to Cuba, send these kids back to THEIR parents.)
To: a fool in paradise
I don't care if they wear bra's but they should wear something.... anything... even trash bags would work
75
posted on
07/31/2014 7:09:53 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: Responsibility2nd; Drumbo
>>> Eye protection. Good idea. One of them sows could turn suddenly and one of them things could swing high in the air and put your eye out.
Only if she’s running.
76
posted on
07/31/2014 9:52:59 PM PDT
by
Titan Magroyne
(What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.)
To: Oliviaforever
By the mere fact that they were topless on the public streets and disrupting an orderly and peaceful assembly by true patriots who have legitimate grievances against the government proves that their disruptive exercise was not peaceful. How were they "not peaceful"? How did they "disrupt" the other protestors?
To: Responsibility2nd
78
posted on
08/03/2014 8:26:51 AM PDT
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Stop wishing for a perfect world. You may get it. Who will you talk to then?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson