Ever see Bader ginsberg and Emily Litella together at the same time? Has Gilda Radner come back from the dead?
Posted on 07/31/2014 2:58:44 PM PDT by NYer
Ping!
WayneS accuses Ruth Bader Ginsberg of being a pro-totalitarian, activist judge.
She has been a member of The Supreme Court, for how many years, and she is just NOW coming out with this psychobabblic drivel?!?!?!
On another news source, she was asked if she would leave, and she said, very directly, I’m not leaving.
By the title of your position, only, I say:
Your Honor, go stuff yourself!
And think about it, this is over the isolated issue of whether a religious employer has to provide their employees with abortion pills.
The women can get their own abortion pills. It’s ridiculous, but Ginzburg is an ultra leftist.
Interestingly, she supposedly opposes Roe v. Wade, and would have left abortion up to the states. But she also says this is because Roe created something for conservatives to rally against. She sounds like a complete liberal hack, not a jurist.
She is an activist judge and I hope she lives to 2017.
I hope she she can survive her brain shrinking like a raisin, for a few more years.
I’ll get you, my pretty! And your little dog, too!
Not surprising to me in the least.
This woman is, IMHO, not what we would traditionally calla “Judge.”
She is an absolute activist who wants to fashion the country into an image after her own progressive making.
Her dissent is chock full of liberal psyco-babble.
“She is an activist judge and I hope she lives to 2017.”
I agree! Can you imagine obama would replace her with? And how long that replacement would be on the Court?
Give her an abortifacient, and let’s be done with her.
What an absolute waste.
She is obsessed with abortion rights of every kind. I always remember that when Slick Willie introduced here as his nominees that one of here first statements was: “A woman can never be equal to a man without the right to choose.”
Obsessed.
The females in SCOTUS have their brains hardwired this way. Isn’t that how they got there in the first place?
These are women who are “accomplished” in man’s business and legal world but generally not accomplished in the woman’s world of loving their family, building a home-front, and raising children who will run the next generation. They’ve been deceived into thinking that pushing papers around is more important than loving and building for the present and the future. Don’t these women generally hate God’s setup of the man being the head and the female role of fitting into a man’s plans, whereby she honors and obeys her husband, loves her children, creates a beautiful home and her husband loves and provides for her?
Isn’t this “mutiny from stern to bow” as Bob Dylan once put it? In order pull off this mutiny, haven’t women had to set aside their soft, feminine nature and become hardened and mannish? And in all of this isn’t there something else that is very true and not often mentioned: that the woman tends to be deceived outside her God-given role and protection of the man (1 Tim 2:12-15)? And aren’t men going along with all this nonsense just like Adam went along with Eve?
In these last days, the whole world is turning from God and mankind resorting back to their natural weaknesses and tendencies. We’re seeing a widespread “Adam and Eve redux”
Not popular in this day and age. But the truth, not popular culture or fiction, is what will help us and heal us and set us free.
That is one stuuuuupid broad!
In other news Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia in an interview with the NYTimes has called Ruth Bader Ginsburg “a contempible, unqualified b..tch.”
“...if the court has a blind spot today, its eyes will be open tomorrow.”
Projecting, Justice Ginsburg? Could it be she who has the ‘blind spot?’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.