Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squawk 8888

I don’t think the article is telling the truth.

Her photos weren’t confiscated. She still has them, as they are digital.

Walmart simply decline to print photos that violated their company policy. That policy is arguably stupid.


29 posted on 08/06/2014 6:59:22 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
Her photos weren’t confiscated. She still has them, as they are digital

The point is that the photos created from the digital files were confiscated. A digital file is not a photo even though it contains all the elements required to create a physical photo.

32 posted on 08/06/2014 7:05:27 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

Whoa, this smacks of a “Hobby Lobby-type” lawsuit developing here. She needs to sue the “pants” off Walmart, and force Walmart to process the pictures!!


34 posted on 08/06/2014 7:22:43 AM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, was not there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson