She is so far off the mark. The Doc and the nurse volunteered there time and risked their lives for their fellow man. This is to be admired, not scorned.
I agree with your points but I also think she made some reasonable points as well. So I agree with both of you. :-)
They risked their lives and now they’re risking yours and mine. We had thousands of miles between the US and the ebola capital of the world, a great natural barrier, but our “government” invited ebola in and its here to stay. The doc and nurse new the risks and they shouldnt have been let back in to the country.
Just more strife, peril and chaos foisted on America by our lying president.
Her point is, “Charity is fine, until you decide the wages of your charity is becoming infected with a highly contagious, pandemic-caliber, virus for which there is no cure.”
If you work for a NGO like this, and decide to deploy to a region with a pandemic like this, you should also agree that if you are infected, then you get help in situ and may God protect you from there.
She might not have said it well, I guess, but I get her point.
You don’t monkey with Ebola. Not at all. I can’t believe they were allowed to come home with it, unless they basically agreed to be human test subjects, which is apparently what happened.