Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: samtheman
It was noble and well intentioned...

And incredibly naive.

34 posted on 08/10/2014 12:28:36 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

Naive and to a certain extent unfair. Unfair to ask American military personnel to expend their lives on “noble and well intentioned” when their duty is “protect and defend the United States”.

Also, there was a huge opportunity cost. Post-9/11, President Bush had a huge amount of political capital. Instead of using it to close the border (which would relate directly to future 9/11 attacks), he used it for “noble and well intentioned”.


38 posted on 08/10/2014 12:32:04 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson