Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Federal Judge Rules AR-15s Are “Dangerous and Unusual,” Not Protected by 2nd Amendment
Guns Save Lives ^ | August 12, 2014 | Dan Cannon

Posted on 08/12/2014 3:39:23 PM PDT by bamahead

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-304 next last
Comment #241 Removed by Moderator

Comment #242 Removed by Moderator

To: B4Ranch

There was a time in the USA when all military equipment, no longer needed, was sold by auction to the public AS IT WAS CONSIDERED PUBLIC PROPERTY!

Now, in the last 100 years, public property, used by the government, has been destroyed or dumped into the ocean to keep from returning it to it’s rightful owners, THE PUBLIC who paid for it in TAXES!


243 posted on 08/13/2014 7:19:04 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (SOUL BROTHER! This house is not armed! (Signs people thought would protect them in the 1960s))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

Comment #244 Removed by Moderator

To: Fai Mao

And the First Amendment covers only hand-set, hand-operated printers. No internet or computers with word-processing capability back then, so, no modern printers not TV or radio when exercising your First Amendment. . .


245 posted on 08/13/2014 7:48:40 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

“The Libety Tree is in a great need of watering.”

And the federal judiciary is in a great need of pruning!


246 posted on 08/13/2014 7:54:23 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unixfox; Lurker
I don’t give a rats ass what some black robed tyrant says.

Problem is, they keep chipping away at our rights, lulling us into apathy. We do nothing about it, as long as the bread and circuses continue.

247 posted on 08/13/2014 7:55:05 AM PDT by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Your comments make too much sense for the Feds to take seriously. You are right but the fed’s goal is to disarm the people, any excuse to do so will be correct in their minds.

The Feds say, “Common sense be damned.”


248 posted on 08/13/2014 8:24:17 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I just knew that was coming...


249 posted on 08/13/2014 8:26:39 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

After reading your comments for years, I rank you up the crazy scale with Ted Nugent. I on the other hand, only rate Duck Dynasty ranking.


250 posted on 08/13/2014 8:27:58 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

M1A Springfield National Match and drums for the AK. Don’t forget ammo.


251 posted on 08/13/2014 8:30:51 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

“Time to feed the hogs.”

A Muzzie judge’s nightmare, would apply to any Muzzie come to think of it. Liked the movie.


252 posted on 08/13/2014 8:34:51 AM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stevio

This sort of thing is the reason why continued control of the House and gaining control of the Senate are so important.

This ruling, if it stands (and I think it will), only applies to
laws enacted at the state level. Because with GOP control of the House (and, presumably the Senate) nothing like this will be enacted at the Federal level.

It means that there are still states for gun owners to go to, where their 2nd Amendment rights won’t be interfered with. TX, KY, etc.


253 posted on 08/13/2014 8:35:33 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Foundahardheadedwoman

Ted Nugent was just one of the locals where I grew up in Michigan.

In fact he sold his house on Luttenton Rd between Hanover and Concord to his taxidermist. As far as I know he’s still there. (Mark Ditzel)


254 posted on 08/13/2014 8:36:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

“and the homosexual culture is highly concentrated in less than 1% of the U.S. population.”

Therfore, we must ban same sex marriage....oh wait!


255 posted on 08/13/2014 8:38:09 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

True. I don’t know what to think when I hear Freepers who want to give this election to the rats. I understand their frustration but unsure if that’s the way to do it.


256 posted on 08/13/2014 8:39:48 AM PDT by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
This gun is DANGEROUS AND UNUSUAL:


257 posted on 08/13/2014 8:43:35 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

“...fall outside Second Amendment protection as dangerous and unusual arms...”

Funny, I couldn’t locate the “dangerous and unusual” clause in the Constitution.


258 posted on 08/13/2014 8:59:48 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (I'd use the /S tag but is it really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility

That was REALLY good!


259 posted on 08/13/2014 9:01:26 AM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

” She is not stupid. She is malicious. She thinks that “unusual and dangerous” is vague enough to hang her ruling on. The question is, where do you draw the line? If 3% is not “common” enough, how about 10%? 49%? There is not a single model common enough to consist of more than 3% of the U.S. stock.”

You nailed it cold!


260 posted on 08/13/2014 9:21:43 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (The only people in the world who fear Obama are American citizens. KILL THE BILL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson