Posted on 08/13/2014 9:51:32 AM PDT by GulliverSwift
Just who is behind the majority of attacks on Rush Limbaugh?
During periods when he’s been heavily under fire, you might think there’s an army out to get him and in a way there is, it’s called the mainstream media. But who gets the ball rolling?
According to a new study conducted for syndicator Premiere Radio Networks and iHeartRadio, just 10 people are responsible for 70% of the hush Rush campaigns.
Not 10 organizations, 10 INDIVIDUALS. That’s one determined bunch.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaequalizer.com ...
Sickos with no life and overflowing with hatred.
Like the comenters say ,if your not going to name the 10 why write the piece.wasted our time
How much is anyone willing to bet that all of the 10, or a significant majority, is made up of the homosexuality mafia types?
Exactly. Whether it’s 10 or 10,000 matters not if they are allowed to snipe from the shadows.
No idea. You’d think that Rush’s syndicator would be willing to put the names out. I guess it’s that they didn’t want to give them publicity.
You can’t do PR like that though. Stupid, imo.
I think the 10 know who they are...and just having the story out there should put them on notice that they have been discovered.
I read the WHOLE dang article to find out WHO the 10 INDIVIDUALS were and the last paragraph says the 10 individuals were NOT NAMED. What a waste of reading. :-(
They don’t name the 10, which makes the claim rather specious.
Is there something new in this? Has some recent event or controversy put this in the news? Rush has always had enemies who weren’t satisfied just to tune out but didnt want anybody else to listen either. Is there something new I haven’t heard about?
not if they are allowed to snipe from the shadows.
That’s what self hating cowards do. Anonymity is their friend.
Not surprised - just look what changes 1.6(ish)% of the population have wrought in this country.
Maybe it’s also that they’re private citizens and perhaps they feel like the people would be “targeted” if their names were known.
My guess is that it was a corporate type that put the kibosh on the naming
No mention of the individuals. Worthless.
Seems like a pointless study without the ability to corroborate it.
8 are likely anonymous cogs working for Media Matters.
Well, the comments certainly were more provacative than the article itself.
Well, for starters today, take a look at www.marketwatch.com right now!!! That little bunch called “media matters” and the twerps/perps from the “Southern Poverty Law Center” headed by that jerk Potock are at the top of the list as far as I’m concerned!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.