This is just plain wrong.
Posted on 08/13/2014 3:42:05 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
A transgender man in Arizona who gave birth to three children after beginning to change from female to male can continue to pursue a divorce, a state appeals court said Wednesday in reversing a judge who refused to end the marriage.
A three-judge panel of the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that Thomas Beatie's marriage to Nancy Beatie in Hawaii in 2003 is considered valid in Arizona and concluded it wasn't a same-sex union.
Last year, a lower court judge denied the divorce request and ruled that Arizona's ban on same-sex marriages prevented the marriage from being recognized as valid.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Yeah, a man can “give birth.”
In what alternative universe?
Life’s changes can cause confusion. /S
It’s still Female no matter what
It still a woman RIGHT
The three-judge panel was able to change “Thomas” Beatie’s chromosomes from XX to XY? We sure are inundated with myriads of King Canutes.
This is just plain wrong.
A woman who retained the physical ability to get pregnant is not a man.
Sorry, children, it’s a same sex union. One of them has just been... altered.
Reporter Jacques Billeaud evidently flunked Biology 101.
If the marriage isn’t valid, then a divorce is not needed.
A ruling of NULITY should be ridiculously easy to obtain...
I wish newspapers would write as you did. Nice to read the truth about those deeply ill people. I’ve read only about 20% bother to get the genital mutilation surgery. As long as people play along with their fantasies (phantasies?), they’re able to pretend.
ridiculous
These reporters should be shot for lying. A man is not a woman and a woman is not a man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.