Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The “militarization” of police was not only inevitable, but necessary
Hot Air ^ | August 16, 2014 | Jazz Shaw

Posted on 08/16/2014 4:38:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The rioting, protests and controversy continue to swirl around Ferguson this weekend, and you will no doubt be reading plenty of coverage from both sides about it. But in the background, a disturbing, larger national conversation has erupted out of the troubles in the St. Louis suburb. The hot topic everywhere seems to be a growing call to halt the so called “militarization” of the nation’s civilian police forces, highlighted by the riot suppression gear on display in Ferguson. It’s an argument coming from both sides of the ideological spectrum, too.

The IBD editorial board warns us to “beware” of this trend. John Fund, writing at National Review, worries over not just police, but a host of federal agencies being armed to the teeth. Bob Barr sounds the alarm as to how the psyche of our police must become warped when they are equipped like soldiers. Our own Noah Rothman has written thoughtfully on the subject, expressing some of his own concerns.

Frankly, I find the whole discussion to be a rather rapid rush to judgement and lacking in larger context. As far as the specific incidents in Ferguson go, we still need a lot more information before final conclusions can be drawn. The details of the initial shooting may remain in question, but what followed was well documented. Riots and looting broke out on a massive scale for such a small town, and continue this morning. The local police stood on the edge of being completely overwhelmed. And whether or not you find their level of response appropriate, this one local disturbance has turned into a national demand to defang the police. The Washington Post quickly began issuing advice on how to tame the cops. Clearly the nation’s legislators were listening, as Hank Johnson (D – Georgia) has already drafted legislation to do just that.

Am I the only one who finds this rather insulting to the nation’s first responders in general? Even if we are to assume that the Ferguson police crossed a line in breaking out their heaviest equipment in an attempt to reestablish control (which has not been conclusively proven at all, in my opinion), what of the rest of the country? As these critics frequently note, police departments in cities and towns of all sizes have been equipped with more modern, military style equipment for quite some time now and they don’t seem to be converting the rest of the nation into a series of oppressive death camps. And far too often, the cops find themselves in need of the “big guns” and body armor.

In case you think I’m coming in late to this debate, it’s not true. There was apparently a meeting held at some point in which Radley Balko was appointed as the go to guy for such discussions, but that dates back quite a ways. More than a year ago, Balko was pushing his ideas about so called “warrior cops” and at that time I penned an editorial stating that he was going too far.

Do we need “kinder and gentler” cops interacting with the community in a friendly fashion? It is certainly to the benefit of the police to be in good standing with a cooperative community and to know the people they protect and serve, but they also deserve a fighting chance when the situation suddenly turns violent and ugly. The rise of “warrior cops” may not be what everyone would hope for, but I don’t see any realistic alternatives.

While I both understand and sympathize with the reminiscing for the good old days, the times have changed. The era of the lovable flatfoot, twirling his baton and wagging a finger at the precocious kid about to steal some penny candy has passed us by. Have we collectively forgotten the riots that took place following the Rodney King verdict? How about the now infamous North Hollywood shootout? And for our friends on the Left, what about the next time somebody goes into an elementary school armed with a Bushmaster and a couple of 9mm Glocks? You don’t want us arming the teachers or having local residents open carrying to keep the school grounds safe. “Leave it to the cops,” you say. But should the cops be going into a situation like that with nothing more than a layer of cotton uniform and a revolver to protect themselves and take down the bad guys? Or should they have to wait until a SWAT unit from an “appropriately large city” shows up, with the shooter mowing down third graders in the meantime?

While the shooting of Michael Brown may provide a teachable moment in terms of police interactions with the community, the nearly immediate mayhem which followed should also serve as a timely reminder. The old assumptions of law enforcement and their unwritten compact with the citizenry relied on a society where the police – and the laws – were respected, and criminals were a minority who would be rejected by the rank and file residents. But when the majority of an entire community decides to break that compact, the formula changes. They realize that they outnumber – and frequently outgun – the cops. A slumbering, snarling beast is awakened and in short order the police can find themselves on the run. This is not a formula for freedom of speech… it’s the path to mayhem and the breakdown of civil society. Before you’re too quick to demand the “demilitarization” of the police, you might want to remember who it is that stands between the neighborhood you have now and South Central L.A circa 1992. And Ferguson has shown us that you don’t need a huge metropolitan area for it to happen.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: crime; ferguson; leo; missouri; policemilitarization; raceriots; riots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-290 next last
To: ifinnegan
I, through my elected officials, decide what equipment the local PD gets.

That's why I want to sit in on budget sessions and buttonhole certain elected buttheads.

Obama has nothing to do with local issues. And he can pound sand if he doesn't like that answer.

/johnny

161 posted on 08/16/2014 7:41:56 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Actually, I kind of like the fact that the Pretend Sojers think that they're "real soldiers" and "warriors".

Couple that thinking with the reality that if a peasant merely breathes on one of the Rugged Warrior Cops, it's a felony or three, and then you have the makings of some serious stupid.

They'll believe they're invincible heroes right up to the moment that they get some serious schooling...

162 posted on 08/16/2014 7:47:20 PM PDT by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

“I, through my elected officials, decide what equipment the local PD gets”

I agree. But you or I are not the only ones voting.

What if populace does not share your views and want all the equipment you mentioned?


163 posted on 08/16/2014 7:48:07 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
What if populace does not share your views and want all the equipment you mentioned?

That's not how it works.

The sap (me) goes and sits in budget hearings and speaks harshly and earnestly to elected officials. The elected officials pay attention to the squeaky wheel.

That's why it's so important to get off one's fundament and go to legislative sessions, and city council meetings, and meet the city administrator.

Letting the city administrator know that you are willing to work for a 'strong mayor' election also helps.

It's called politics.

/johnny

164 posted on 08/16/2014 7:54:26 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The REAL irony in the situation in Ferguson is that the young man killed was a member of the very community and demographic that support the “radical transformation of America” (aka SOCIALISM) under obozo.  Because there are millions of us who still revere the Founders’ vision for this place and the Constitution they left us (mainly the educated and historically knowledgeable middle class), the sort of police militarization/intimidation (ala Gestapo) we’re now witnessing is NECESSARY to crush any dissent. 
Now THAT’S a textbook example of being careful what you wish for.
That said, I’m afraid most of those folks are so ignorant of the history of tyranny and enamored of their agenda that they never saw the police state coming until it was too late. 
Unless and until something is done to halt the process,  all of us are about to get a good look at the underside of Big Brother’s boot very soon.


165 posted on 08/16/2014 7:59:56 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

You are fantastic.

Why don’t you go tell Obama what to do. You’re being remiss in not using your powers for an even greater good.


166 posted on 08/16/2014 8:05:04 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
All I can do is tell him to butt out.

And be there.

And I will be there at the budget hearings. And I will talk to the politicians.

I'm just a squeaky wheel.

I'm glad you like it. You should try getting involved.

/johnny

167 posted on 08/16/2014 8:10:01 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
I do love the look on a bean-counter's face when their entire budget gets red lined during a budget hearing.

Entire budget, gone. Poof.

It's what keeps me awake during the most boring activity devised by mankind.

/johnny

168 posted on 08/16/2014 8:12:38 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist; 2ndDivisionVet
Really, how many of us have ever seen cops armed with the equipment we are seeing in these photos?

Ummmm - you have to stop reading Obama's Palace Guard media.

I go to the Brit paper websites. They don't get the memo to "suppress" photos of the militarized American police.

I've been posting Pretend Sojer photos on FR for a year or two now.

169 posted on 08/16/2014 8:15:24 PM PDT by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
Naiveté is cute, but expensive.

Hundreds of millions of dollars of military surplus is being transferred to local PDs, and some folks don't want to recognize that.

/johnny

170 posted on 08/16/2014 8:18:22 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Nothing if you can’t figure it out.

And yes, I understand everything you posted—I just vehemently disagree with your position and caution against such foolish idealism. Most of the German aristocracy prior to WWII would have agreed with you, but that is poor company in my opinion.


171 posted on 08/16/2014 8:31:28 PM PDT by antidisestablishment (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Yeah, that means absolutely nothing. The internet has made national, and international news local. A cop in Philly does something wrong, then a cop in Atlanta does something wrong, and finally a cop in Phoenix does something wrong, and Free Republic goes wild about the the chronic misbehavior of cops. All the while forgetting there are around 800,000 cops in the U.S. I really don’t care if you can pull up a photo of cops responding to some incident in another part of the country, how many times have you seen your local police use that type of equipment?


172 posted on 08/16/2014 8:36:40 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

The most popular boys name in Britain is Mohamed.


173 posted on 08/16/2014 8:36:54 PM PDT by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn
So? Are you saying that disarming local LE means that the name Mohamed will become more popular?

Or are you showing off your knowledge of current events?

What perzactly are you trying to say?

/johnny

174 posted on 08/16/2014 8:40:11 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist
Are you denying that there is a transfer of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of equipment from the military to local PDs?

/johnny

175 posted on 08/16/2014 8:42:06 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Yes, there is SCADS of naiveté displayed on this thread.

You've done an excellent job on the entire thread.

May your work with our elected butthaids be as fruitful...

176 posted on 08/16/2014 8:49:43 PM PDT by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Nope. And some of it is pretty questionable, but my understanding is it all still belongs to the military, and is subject to recall when the military needs it. My point is that it is not being used for day to day operations. It is being used when there is a predictable threat that rises above normal operations. Most of us will never see that stuff in use.


177 posted on 08/16/2014 8:50:37 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
I encourage everyone to sleep through attend a government budget hearing, local or State.

It's easy to make a difference when you have leverage.

Take caffeine pills before, though. It's deadly boring.

/johnny

178 posted on 08/16/2014 8:52:04 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist
My city. My police department.

I don't want the incompetent bastards to HAVE it in the first place.

/johnny

179 posted on 08/16/2014 8:53:42 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist
but my understanding is it all still belongs to the military, and is subject to recall when the military needs it.

That's not how local accounting documents show it.

MOUs are great, but the budget documents speak volumes.

/johnny

180 posted on 08/16/2014 8:55:26 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson