Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate-Cooling Policies threaten Food Supplies
americanthinker.com ^ | 8/20/2014 | Viv Forbes

Posted on 08/20/2014 6:40:12 AM PDT by rktman

A warmer, wetter climate with more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would undoubtedly produce more plant growth and more food.

However climate-cooling policies that claim to prevent global warming by throttling the use of carbon fuels will definitely reduce food supply and increase food prices.

The promotion of ethanol for motor fuel is anti-food. This “food for fuel” program has absorbed significant quantities of corn, soy beans, sugar and palm oils. Consequently prices for ethanol crops are higher than they would otherwise be, encouraging farmers to convert land currently devoted to grazing animals and other food crops to growing more profitable crops for ethanol.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ecowackos; epa; gangreen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: rktman

Got a conference call from the ethanol industry about Jim Jordan’s efforts to repeal EPA mandate.
Janet Garrett is a write in Dem candidate for the 4th. With this district being mainly agricultural biz, the threat of lower grain prices may make a difference in this election.


21 posted on 08/20/2014 9:26:43 AM PDT by griswold3 (I was born here in America. I will die here in a third world country. Obama succeeded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: huldah1776

That’s why many commercial greenhouses elevate CO2 levels, to around 1000 ppm IIRC. Plenty of folks sell systems for this.


25 posted on 08/22/2014 3:33:48 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


26 posted on 08/23/2014 7:49:41 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Plants need CO2 and warmth.

We need plants.

It’s too logical. There must be some way to make this more complicated.


27 posted on 08/23/2014 9:08:21 PM PDT by Rocky (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

That’s a good one Rocky. Now if we can just convince the true believers that CuhO2 is good for us. Hope we got plenty of time on our hands. How absurd is it that seemingly smart people are so easily convinced there’s a boogeyman in the closet? I read kellogs cereal is going to require all it’s suppliers to document and submit data about their carbon footprint. So, if it’s too high(determined by who)will they lose their contract? I have a footprint I’d like to place somewhere. :>}


28 posted on 08/24/2014 7:01:41 AM PDT by rktman (Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson