Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Gives Intelligence To Assad For Targetting Isis Commanders
IBTimes Co., Ltd. ^ | August 23, 2014 15:58 BST | Tom Porter

Posted on 08/23/2014 9:10:15 AM PDT by GonzoII

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: Henry Hnyellar

Am I correct in Thighness’ calling Petraeus ‘BetrayUS’? Or someone on her staff did?

I sense a CheckMate coming up.


101 posted on 08/23/2014 1:55:44 PM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

I still think it’s likely he’ll be made into a martyr....Remember the ugly black widow spider dress that moochelle wore at his first acceptance speech?


Yes. What about it?


102 posted on 08/23/2014 2:42:52 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Smartest move I’ve seen out of this administration in a while. We don’t have to love Assad to have a common enemy.

I highly suspect and would be surprised if it was nothing but another lie from the Obama regime.

Obama could care less about ISIS, the only reason he's done anything thus far was for purposes of political cover amidst the public outcry over genocidal slaughters in Iraq. And even then, Obama, has done the bare minimum militarily. In fact, I would venture to guess he has spent more time crafting statements to the press then he has crafting policy against ISIS.

Obama wants Assad gone and he wants Middle East stability gone so that Islamic rule can fill the vacuum. The Arab spring is his behind the scenes project and Syria is the next domino he wishes to topple. Any excuse Obama can use to bomb Syria will be the beginning of yet another Obama subversion of what the American people want him to do with the powers they give him to do it with.

103 posted on 08/23/2014 2:46:18 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

I never understood their going against Iran and Russia in this in the first place. What better way to get the approval of Christian America than to create the situation where think they are finally doing the right thing.


104 posted on 08/23/2014 4:21:24 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

“where they (we) think they are finally doing the right thing.”

Sorry, sugar crash.


105 posted on 08/23/2014 4:33:18 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Or something like that.


106 posted on 08/23/2014 4:37:51 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Just trying to make sure I have this right...

The enemy of my enemy is the friend

...of my friend of my enemy of my enemy

...of my enemy’s friend

...or something like that?

Doesn’t that make me my own worst enemy???


107 posted on 08/23/2014 6:00:48 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (Please pass the aspirin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oscar in Batangas

...Or is it still BHO?


108 posted on 08/23/2014 6:01:44 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (Please pass the aspirin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Oscar in Batangas

...Or is he just our own worst enemA???


109 posted on 08/23/2014 6:02:42 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (3-D chess is SO hard for a 2-D checkers neophyte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

BHO,Clinton,and Kerry show the utter meaninglessness of an Ivy League education.

These people are fools.


110 posted on 08/23/2014 6:52:59 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Agree. In the absence of a viable good choice, choose the lesser evil, if pressed. A nasty secular regime is preferable to Islamic fundamentalism. I’d have even aligned with the Soviets against Afghanistan’s mujahideen, if faced with the choice.


111 posted on 08/23/2014 7:51:14 PM PDT by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." --Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
***subtle clues to high-echelon military unrest and frustration ...***

I tell my son often these past few years that this Admin is driving the military to the same position they were in at Rome just prior to the Caesars... For one thing, imagine being told not to fire back when fired upon... just deliver a free meal to your attackers...

112 posted on 08/24/2014 7:54:51 AM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
I just can't agree that our foreign policy of getting in entangling alliances all over the world to manipulate the oil interests and other corporate elitists global concerns is what the US is supposed to be about. The MidEast was much better off with thugs who stopped things from exploding. Saudi Arabia is not friend or ally; the hypocrisy of supporting them but not the strong-arm govs in Egypt, Libya, and Syria is appalling. In Ukraine, the world would be better off if it's partitioned and put under the rule of surrounding govs who don't fight wars against their own citizens.

911....the maniacs were Saudi. Pakistan...where Osama hung out for years. The Tsarnoff bombers...refugees from a region whose radicals we support. Qatar...probably funding ISIS types. The gov we try to topple in Syria....would be a successful partner in fight ISIS if the US weren't funding, training, and providng arms to try to topple the Assad government. Libya...hows that going for our oil interests?

No, we need to clean up our mess at home, allow Russia its sphere of influence, don't topple thugs who provide for their people, don't create wars, and protect minorities. Our policies have not been based on the principles the US was founded on, and it's coming back to slap us in the face.

113 posted on 08/24/2014 9:01:40 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

If we had energy independence, we would then care less about who runs the Middle East.

It should have been the top national priority after the Arab Oil Embargo in 1973.


114 posted on 08/24/2014 9:07:09 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
If we had energy independence, we would then care less about who runs the Middle East. It should have been the top national priority after the Arab Oil Embargo in 1973.

Energy independence is not something you conjure up. Literally trillions in subsidies later, no one has come up with a way to produce gasoline cheaper than from oil or with a viable alternative fuel to gasoline that matches it on price and versatility. At $200 per barrel, we are energy independent, because a huge chunk of our deposits are economically viable at that price. But $200 oil will crush the economy. Because whether we are buying it from the Middle East or domestically, $200 oil is well above what the country can afford without going into recession.

115 posted on 08/24/2014 11:12:35 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson