Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the Aurora theater shooting “foreseeable” by owners?
Hotair ^

Posted on 08/23/2014 12:59:09 PM PDT by chessplayer

"The owner of the Aurora movie theater that was the site of a deadly 2012 attack could have reasonably enough foreseen the danger of such an attack to be held liable for it, a federal judge ruled Friday."

"Noting “the grim history of mass shootings and mass killings that have occurred in more recent times,” U.S. District Court Judge R. Brooke Jackson ruled that Cinemark — owner of the Century Aurora 16 theater — could have predicted that movie patrons might be targeted for an attack. Jackson’s ruling allows 20 lawsuits filed by survivors of the attack or relatives of those killed to proceed toward trial."

While I would think that such a lawsuit is simply absurd, even in our overly litigious society, it’s worth noting that the judge has not ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, but simply allowed the case to be heard. Still, the idea that simply because the theater owner should be aware that mass shootings had taken place in other (non-theater) crowded buildings they should be liable for the actions of madmen boggles the mind.

When you go to see a movie at the theater, you – as a patron – have a few reasonable expectations. You should be able to expect that the movie will be shown with clear video and audio. The snacks should not prove to be toxic. The building – under normal weather conditions – should not fall down on your head. If any of those conditions fall though, you’d probably have a right to demand compensation from the owners. But if your loss comes from the actions of a madman (”Perhaps the defining feature of crazy people is that they’re unpredictable”) then you are placing the blame on the owners for something as far out of their control as if a tornado hit the theater out of a clear sky.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Doesn't boggle the mind in the least. Not nowadays.
1 posted on 08/23/2014 12:59:09 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

The theater refused to allow its patrons to defend themselves by putting up signs that made it illegal for CHL holders to be armed.

They need to be punished financially for such a stupid decision.


2 posted on 08/23/2014 1:00:50 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Given the “no firearms” signs, it wasn’t inevitable, but clearly an increased likelihood.


3 posted on 08/23/2014 1:01:13 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

The theater refused to allow its patrons to defend themselves by putting up signs that made it illegal for CHL holders to be armed.

They need to be punished financially for such a stupid decision.


So you agree they need to be sued into oblivion. It’s all the theatre owners fault.


4 posted on 08/23/2014 1:04:50 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
The people of Aurora should ride this judge out on a rail. Judges like this are the ones ruining this country. They wave their scepters and rule worse than Kings. But... Since this sign was up, he may have a point.
5 posted on 08/23/2014 1:05:30 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton

“Given the “no firearms” signs, it wasn’t inevitable, but clearly an increased likelihood.”

I carry a small, easily concealed gun. Nobody will know I have it unless I have to use it. In that event I’m guessing nobody will complain that I had it. Even so, my plan it to put it away and walk quietly to the door.


6 posted on 08/23/2014 1:06:26 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Not sure about other states, but a “no firearms” sign in Washington state will only get you an invitation to leave should you get “caught “ I’ve yet to hear of anyone getting frisked at the front door. Bottom line. Sign or no sign, I carry EVERYWHERE.


7 posted on 08/23/2014 1:12:19 PM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I was boggled until I read about the sign.

I am now unboggled. When the owner explicitly refuses to allow customers in his establishment to protect themselves, then he is shouldering the responsibility in their stead, and he failed to protect them.


8 posted on 08/23/2014 1:16:49 PM PDT by Sparklite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

Wait until ISIS is turned loose on our streets and everyone will be carrying regardless of these stupid laws.


9 posted on 08/23/2014 1:17:16 PM PDT by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian
The theater refused to allow its patrons to defend themselves by putting up signs that made it illegal for CHL holders to be armed.

if anything, the patrons should be held responsible... because of mass shootings in other places, they should have foreseen the possibility of a mass shooting... and then to go to a theatre that does not allow firearms, they should have foreseen an even greater possibility of a mass shooting...

10 posted on 08/23/2014 1:18:55 PM PDT by latina4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
The California courts dealt with this issue 30 years ago after the McDonald's shooting in San Diego. Their holding sounds just as relevant to this case: Under the circumstances here, it cannot be reasonably urged that had McDonald's provided an unarmed, uniformed licensed security guard, the massacre would have been prevented or its extent diminished. The record defies such a conclusion. Rather, it paints a portrait of a demented, mentally unbalanced man, bent on murder and self-destruction, who viewed the nearby McDonald's restaurant with his binoculars from his apartment, kissed his wife goodbye and stated he was going "hunting for humans." Huberty set out to kill the most people possible and went to the restaurant, unconcerned with detection, dressed in camouflage fatigue pants and heavily armed. Upon entry into the restaurant, he immediately began firing his weapons indiscriminately at everything and everyone in sight, reloading his weapons periodically and walking up and down the aisles slaughtering those he found still alive. His only apparent motive was killing. He made no effort to rob the restaurant, made no demands for money, and made no effort to take hostages. His indiscriminate slaughter of human beings — the worst mass killing by a single assailant in recent American history — only ended when he believed all were dead and he was felled by a police sharpshooter.

On this record, we conclude plaintiffs have failed to establish any triable issue that there was a causal nexus between McDonald's nonfeasance, if any, and the resulting injuries. Any reasonable protective measure such as security cameras, alarms and unarmed security guards, might have deterred ordinary criminal conduct because of the potential of identification and capture, but could not reasonably be expected to deter or hinder a maniacal, suicidal assailant unconcerned with his own safety, bent on committing mass murder.

11 posted on 08/23/2014 1:20:01 PM PDT by Benito Cereno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
So where could you go, or what could you do that would not have the foreseeable consequence of your being shot by a mad man?
Naval base? Army base? School? Hospital Church? Airport? Home? Mall? Restaurant? Hotel? Highway?
All of these places have been the scenes of senseless murders. If every conceivable venue is susceptible to the actions of lunatics how can a theater be singled out?
12 posted on 08/23/2014 1:23:43 PM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Judge was appointed by Obama. . .

From the Freeper addenda to the new ICD-10:

321.0 SPLAT Liberal Cerebral Defenestration (LCD) or Liberal Acquired Brain Absence (LABA), Complete loss of rationality, cognition, and cerebration due to indiscriminately keeping one's mind so far open that the brain falls out. First and subsequent encounters.

13 posted on 08/23/2014 1:24:00 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

The fact you are in a theater, sports arena, opera, or whatever, should have no bearing on the liability of the matter. The person who harmed the patrons was NOT the theater owner or management, it was a person with a poor grasp of reality indulging in unreasoned and wanton destruction of life and well-being of others.

The only remotely possible rationalization the judge may have been expressing was trying to assign liability here, based on the likelihood that the owner or management has access to “deep pockets”, while the actual perpetrator, the deranged young man, would have had no such assets.

Sometimes you just have to suck it up, or apply for charity elsewhere. There is no promise that “somebody, somewhere is gonna PAY!”

Rationalization is not prudence. It is sometimes very tortured logic, and does not register well with the realities of the world.


14 posted on 08/23/2014 1:25:20 PM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

One of my favorite memes I created.

15 posted on 08/23/2014 1:26:18 PM PDT by CodeToad (Romney is a raisin cookie looking for chocolate chip cookie votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Great. Now there will be metal detectors on every auditorium and church for insurance purposes.


16 posted on 08/23/2014 1:28:12 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

“Noting “the grim history of mass shootings and mass killings that have occurred in more recent times,” U.S. District Court Judge R. Brooke Jackson ruled that Cinemark — owner of the Century Aurora 16 theater — could have predicted that movie patrons might be targeted for an attack.”

Based on that concept and ruling, President Obama, who has all the money and all the staff, the NSA, DHS,and the FBI, should have predicted this, and given CINEMARK a ‘heads up’.

All lawsuits should be directed against Obama, before anyone can direct a lawsuit against CINEMARK.


17 posted on 08/23/2014 1:30:50 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

The liberal logic here is inescapable. Since crimes like this have occurred then this type of crime is foreseeable. If the crime is foreseeable then owners of private property are liable. In order to eliminate that liability private property should be eliminated. The crimes will continue but since all property will be gov. property no one will be liable for it. Problem solved!


18 posted on 08/23/2014 1:39:33 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benito Cereno

The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.


19 posted on 08/23/2014 1:42:11 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

20 posted on 08/23/2014 1:44:30 PM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson