To: 2ndDivisionVet
Legislate in haste. Litigate in leisure.
2 posted on
08/26/2014 1:23:17 AM PDT by
monocle
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The author is a liar.
The writer of this section of the healthcare law wrote exactly what he intended and he will tell you as much.
He wrote it to bribe the states into creating their own exchanges and did not believe for a moment they wouldn’t do it. He was wrong.
3 posted on
08/26/2014 1:40:52 AM PDT by
DB
To: 2ndDivisionVet
4 posted on
08/26/2014 1:41:56 AM PDT by
Zakeet
(It's not a debt ceiling - it's a debt target)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Uh... No. Roberts would rewrite the word anyway.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Uh... No. Roberts would rewrite the word anyway.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
fta ...piecing together a compromise that sought to create a national system of subsidized insurance but one run by the states.
*********************
The ACA was NOT a compromise (implying bipartisan support). Its writing was done behind closed doors by Dems and its passage through House and Senate received NO ‘Pub votes.
I think it’s hilarious that the Dems are running around like chicken little, because the bill clearly says only people signed up through State exchanges can get subsidies.
7 posted on
08/26/2014 1:47:09 AM PDT by
octex
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A glitch is a real BITCH.
Kinda like HITLERY. . . . .
14 posted on
08/26/2014 2:54:19 AM PDT by
DeaconRed
(Jump! Go ahead and JUMP! ! ! ! ! (To ZERO as he stands on the WH Balcony))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
FedGov is rapidly losing legitimacy, and even liberals are going to start worrying about that. It’s time to follow the letter of the law or accept the consequences, and with a law as evil and destructive as ObamaCare those consequences will not be pretty.
16 posted on
08/26/2014 3:10:14 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
As a wise man once said, “Words mean things.”
17 posted on
08/26/2014 3:10:36 AM PDT by
Hugin
("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Uh...no. There is something called the “intent of the law.”
18 posted on
08/26/2014 3:11:47 AM PDT by
EBH
(And the head wound was healed, and Gog became man.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That prospect has sparked an intense debate over how the disputed language ended up in the law....There is no debate about it at all.
The language was changed to remove subsidies for Federal exchanges because if it wasn't changed the law would not have passed.
That being the case, a court decision that this fact is irrelevant would be - revolutionary.
22 posted on
08/26/2014 3:51:32 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It seems a multitude of issues should “doom” obamacare, but nothing ever does, then again, we are not in America anymore.
I don’t see anything in the future to turn things around, except...Revolution Now!
37 posted on
08/26/2014 6:29:14 AM PDT by
PoloSec
( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Nope. And all of this “gonna get rid of obamacare, obamacare will be overturned, etal.” bullcrap is just to keep the sheep calm. Cruz had the recipe for getting rid of obamacare and the Republicans, led by Mitch McConnell stabbed him in the back. That proves that the Republican Party wants obamacare as bad as the Democrats.
42 posted on
08/27/2014 7:00:28 AM PDT by
sport
To: 2ndDivisionVet
These are, after all, people who consider the Constitution a “glitch” that needs a serious rewrite.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Calling it a glitch or an error is one of the biggest lies ever told.
46 posted on
08/31/2014 8:39:30 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson