Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kennard

What is your take on the seriousness of aboriginal land titles? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The way that Canada’s Constitutional Law works pertaininh to the distribution of powers from the old British North America Act, section 92, the law pertaining to real estate is relegated to the provinces, and so any federal court decision on aboriginal property rights does not have to be acted upon or even recognized by any provincial government.

Meanwhile, the The federal law regulates Native status and administration as a federal matter.

Until the various provincial governments recognize aborigional property rights, it is pretty difficult for native interests to gain expansion, outside of the lands already specifically granted or reserved to them by previous acts of the Crown and by various treaties.


14 posted on 08/27/2014 7:37:11 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7; Kennard

Compounding the problem is that most of the Band Councils are quite happy with the fact that all property on the reserve is communal, because it allows them to control people by denying them decent housing. Whenever the topic of individual property titles comes up, all hell breaks loose.


16 posted on 08/27/2014 8:29:06 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson