Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harper cements a laudable legacy in the North, with just a handful of glaring omissions
National Post ^ | August 26, 2014 | Michael Den Tandt

Posted on 08/26/2014 5:21:14 PM PDT by Squawk 8888

BAFFIN ISLAND — As Prime Minister Stephen Harper heads back to the office, concluding his ninth Arctic summer tour, his strategists and senior staff will be congratulating themselves on a job well done.

To be fair, they have some reasons to feel that way.

As such junkets go, this one went off more or less without a hitch. There were no pratfalls; no trips, slips, incidents or shoves. Apart from a single sign that nearly toppled onto the prime minister on the first morning, the visuals beamed back to newsrooms in Ottawa, Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver have been positive for the Conservatives and for Mr. Harper personally.

These include the PM wading into a crowd of happy Inuit children in Arctic Bay; picturesquely bestriding the bow of a Canadian navy patrol boat, as it steamed through the Northwest Passage, the first such voyage by a sitting Canadian leader; and addressing Canadian soldiers here Tuesday, on the pristine banks of Frobisher Bay, as they carried out operation Nanook, their major northern summer exercise.

Thursday’s speech, unlike the more political ones earlier in this tour, was straight-up chest-pounding patriotism, no chaser. The PM waxed historical about the lost explorer Sir John Franklin, then hammered away at Russian strongman Vladimir Putin, and the peril posed to civilized peoples by the Islamic State. This will be meat and drink to the Conservative base. It won’t go over so badly with swing voters, either.

And there are other pluses, from the Tory standpoint. The PM’s Franklin gambit has worked out rather well; In putting the resources of the government and his own political capital behind the search for the lost ships, Erebus and Terror, Mr. Harper has galvanized a coalition of interests and brought them in behind his government, as I wrote last time.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalpost.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2014 5:21:14 PM PDT by Squawk 8888
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

2 posted on 08/26/2014 5:22:37 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Harper is a true leader and probably one of the biggest supporters of Israel. No wonder lefties up north and down here can’t stand the guy.


3 posted on 08/26/2014 5:25:16 PM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

Yep. Back when BHO was promising to “fundamentally transform” America, Harper was already starting to “fundamentally transform” Canada back to the great nation it was and will be again. Harper may help Canada fulfill Sir Wilfrid Laurier’s vision, albeit 100 years later.


4 posted on 08/26/2014 5:30:18 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Yep. He’s transforming Canada into a major economic power and how long will it be before you see the exodus of American companies going up north?


5 posted on 08/26/2014 5:37:26 PM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet
It's been happening for a while, and Burger King just opened the floodgates. They're moving their HQ to a suburb of Toronto because corporate taxes are lower here.
6 posted on 08/26/2014 5:44:43 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

The damage the Nazi-turned-Communist Trudeau did runs deep. Good to see Harper working hard to repair it.


7 posted on 08/26/2014 5:51:03 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
The author knocks Harper for lack of success in addressing aboriginal land title, recently lent credence by the Supreme Court of Canada and for not mentioning climate change, aka AGW. These are both Liberal Party issues, part of the reason that Justin Trudeau is ten points ahead in the polls.

I think we all agree that climate change and AGW is spurious and that the best way to handle it with the Suzuki-watching LIVs, for Conservatives, is with platitudes. Aboriginal land titles, however, may turn out to be a serious problem, aided and abetted by the anti-growth Liberals and NDP.

What is your take on the seriousness of aboriginal land titles?

8 posted on 08/26/2014 6:45:26 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

Imagine we are descended upon by a fleet of alien ships, the ‘from up there’ kind of aliens.

How much credence were our land titles mean if they decided to settle here?


9 posted on 08/26/2014 6:54:20 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

Harper’s been trying his damnedest to address aboriginal issues, and not just land titles. The real problem is that there are too many First Nations “Leaders” who have a vested interest in the status quo. With birthrates among First Nations the highest in the country, failure to deal with it will mean lost opportunities for everyone and another two or three generations of poverty, corruption and violence on the reserves.


10 posted on 08/26/2014 7:32:37 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
"...the visuals beamed back to newsrooms in Ottawa, Toronto, Calgary..."

What numbskull wrote this? Harper only gets CBCROGERSBELL coverage when he steps in bubble gum PRIME MINISTER GAFFE WOMEN MINORITIES MUSLIM COMMUNITIES DAMAGED STICKY MESS EVERYWHERE. HARPER: "No Comment."
11 posted on 08/26/2014 9:04:20 PM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

What troop is this?


12 posted on 08/27/2014 3:22:02 PM PDT by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888; Kennard
Harper has been trying his best (more than others) with the "Native" problem. I once read that if the Canadian government gave every "First Nation Status" person one million dollars, and then said all subsidies and tax exemptions are gone, we would save a lot of money in a very timely matter. As far as the Glow Bull warming thing, enough said.

Then again, when did the National Post start having such *sshats write for them?

13 posted on 08/27/2014 5:52:34 PM PDT by Dartman (CDN PM Stephen Harper may not be perfect, but we don't have to be ashamed or embarassed of him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

What is your take on the seriousness of aboriginal land titles? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The way that Canada’s Constitutional Law works pertaininh to the distribution of powers from the old British North America Act, section 92, the law pertaining to real estate is relegated to the provinces, and so any federal court decision on aboriginal property rights does not have to be acted upon or even recognized by any provincial government.

Meanwhile, the The federal law regulates Native status and administration as a federal matter.

Until the various provincial governments recognize aborigional property rights, it is pretty difficult for native interests to gain expansion, outside of the lands already specifically granted or reserved to them by previous acts of the Crown and by various treaties.


14 posted on 08/27/2014 7:37:11 PM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldNewYork

Not sure what troop, but they’re Arctic Rangers, reservists (primarily Inuit) who patrol the far north. You can probably find more info at the official Prime Minister’s website, http://pm.gc.ca/


15 posted on 08/27/2014 8:25:41 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; Kennard

Compounding the problem is that most of the Band Councils are quite happy with the fact that all property on the reserve is communal, because it allows them to control people by denying them decent housing. Whenever the topic of individual property titles comes up, all hell breaks loose.


16 posted on 08/27/2014 8:29:06 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888; Candor7
The aboriginal political issue that affects the economic interests of all Canadians is resource development and specifically pipelines. This is the lifeblood of the Canadian economy. In the past, projects have been killed, notably the MacKenzie Valley Pipeline, by aboriginal intransigence. As of June 26th, we now have the Supreme Court of Canada's Tsilhqot’in decision. If a project has a compelling and substantial public purpose and the aboriginal title holder has been adequately consulted, then it's a go. None of these tests are defined in the decision, statute or precedent. That means every major development must go to the SCC. Great, in my view, the Court volunteered to arbitrate. The Federal Government can take the Pontius Pilate approach, as they effectively did with their earlier lukewarm "approval" of Enbridge's Northern Gateway project. They can 'punt' the decision to the Court. That lifts most of the political heat from the Federal Government. The Provinces can be parties to the action and cheer lead or pander at their option, but not obstruct. In the end, the aboriginals will rationally negotiate an attractive financial package for themselves with the proponent and won't be manning the barricades and shooting Mounties.

This all looks positive to me. Am I being naive?

17 posted on 08/27/2014 10:53:40 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

It’s one possible outcome. The other positive has been in BC, where some Nations, such as the Nisga’a, negotiated treaties (there are still a few Nations without treaty) that effectively nullified the Indian Act and allowed Fee Simple property titles, then bargained hard with resource companies for mineral, fishing and logging rights. The deals typically include investment in education & infrastructure, hiring preferences for local members, and cash royalty payments for members. Most of the other bands have condemned them for abandoning their native “heritage” but they don’t care because everyone’s better off.

BTW I think that living conditions on most reserves are utterly despicable and should not be tolerated by the people of a First World nation such as ours. The problem is that anyone who tries to make meaningful progress is branded a racist or a traitor. Shawn Atleo, former National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations, learned that the hard way.


18 posted on 08/27/2014 11:36:15 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kennard

To your point on the Supreme Court- it was hardly the first time the politicians punted an issue to then. Abortion was the most notorious example; the Supreme Court ruled that the Conspiring to Procure a Miscarriage section of the Criminal Code was unconstitutional on fairly narrow grounds, and that it was Parliament’s responsibility to rewrite it in a way that would comply with the Constitution Acts 1967 & 1982 and English Common Law. In the media the ruling quickly morphed into “A woman’s Charter Right to abortion”, and every politician who raised the issue had effectively destroyed his own career. That is why to this day Canada is the only country in the world that has NO laws of any kind about abortion.


19 posted on 08/27/2014 11:44:59 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Thanks for that. I’ve never seen military wearing red sweatshirts and carrying rifles like those.


20 posted on 08/28/2014 2:39:08 PM PDT by OldNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson