Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inversion Controversy Is about Whether Company Profits Should Flow to Shareholders or Government
Townhall.com ^ | August 28, 2014 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 08/28/2014 4:24:28 PM PDT by Kaslin

Since I’ve been in Washington for nearly three decades, I’m used to foolish demagoguery.

But the left’s reaction to corporate inversions takes political rhetoric to a new level of dishonesty.

Every study that looks at business taxation reaches the same conclusion, which is that America’s tax system is punitive and anti-competitive.

Simply stated, the combination of a very high tax rate on corporate income along with a very punitive system of worldwide taxation makes it very difficult for an American-domiciled firm to compete overseas.

Yet some politicians say companies are being “unpatriotic” for trying to protect themselves and even suggest that the tax burden on firms should be further increased!

In this CNBC interview, I say that’s akin to “blaming the victim.”

While I think this was a good interview and I assume the viewers of CNBC are an important demographic, I’m even more concerned (at least in the short run) about influencing the opinions of the folks in Washington.

And that’s why the Cato Institute held a forum yesterday for a standing-room-only crowd on Capitol Hill.

Here is a sampling of the information I shared with the congressional staffers.

We’ll start with this chart showing how the United States has fallen behind the rest of the world on corporate tax rates.

Here’s a chart showing the number of nations that have worldwide tax systems. Once again, you can see a clear trend in the right direction, with the United States getting left behind.

Next, this chart shows that American companies already pay a lot of tax on the income they earn abroad.

Last but not least, here’s a chart showing that inversions have almost no effect on corporate tax revenue in America.

The moral of the story is that the internal revenue code is a mess, which is why (as I said in the interview) companies have both a moral and fiduciary obligation to take legal steps to protect the interests of shareholders, consumers, and employees.

The anti-inversion crowd, though, is more interested in maximizing the amount of money going to politicians.

Actually, let me revise that last sentence. If they looked at the Laffer Curve evidence (here and here), they would support a lower corporate tax rate.

So we’re left with the conclusion that they’re really most interested in making the tax code punitive, regardless of what happens to revenue.

P.S. Don’t forget that your tax dollars are subsidizing a bunch of international bureaucrats in Paris that are trying to impose similar policies on a global basis.

P.P.S. Let’s end with a note on another tax-related issue.

We’ve already looked at evidence suggesting that Lois Lerner engaged in criminal behavior.

Now we have even more reasons to suspect she’s a crook. Here are some excerpts from the New York Observer.

The IRS filing in federal Judge Emmet Sullivan’s court reveals shocking new information. The IRS destroyed Lerner’s Blackberry AFTER it knew her computer had crashed and after a Congressional inquiry was well underway. As an IRS official declared under the penalty of perjury, the destroyed Blackberry would have contained the same emails (both sent and received) as Lois Lerner’s hard drive. …With incredible disregard for the law and the Congressional inquiry, the IRS admits that this Blackberry “was removed or wiped clean of any sensitive or proprietary information and removed as scrap for disposal in June 2012.” This is a year after her hard drive “crash” and months after the Congressional inquiry began. …One thing is clear: the IRS has no interest in recovering the emails. It has deliberately destroyed evidence and another direct source of the emails it claims were “lost.” It has been blatantly negligent if not criminal in faiing to preserve evidence and destroying it instead.

Utterly disgusting.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/28/2014 4:24:28 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In a socialistic country it’d go to the government and the government would then go after whatever the shareholders received.


2 posted on 08/28/2014 4:38:35 PM PDT by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This better be THE major campaign issue in 2016. If we ever want to have a thriving economy, near zero unemployment, a growing middle class, elimination of the welfare class and a return to American values, there needs to be radical tax reform. When I write radical, I mean the complete elimination of ALL taxes on American businesses.

This certainly shifts the burden directly on consumers, but what must be realized is that consumers are already indirectly burdened. Imagine the savings to ALL businesses in just not trying to avoid taxes and preparing tax returns. This is a matter of focus. Businesses would be able to focus on the business of serving their customers and not a bunch of other things that have nothing to do with serving their customers.

Imagine the influx of foreign businesses to America. Imagine the competition for employees - increasing wages, reentry of those that have left the workforce and the incentive for the lazy and illiterate to do the things to be part of the workforce. (Combine the elimination of business taxes with the elimination of welfare spending and the takers are forced to become makers.)

To the naysayers that say lawyers and tax accountants would never let this happen, it is time for you to get with the program and denegrate those that benefit from the tax code. If there are any lingering lawyers and tax accountants reading this, you better man-up. If you are so smart and so capable to the comprehend the tax code, then you are smart enough to add real value to businesses.

3 posted on 08/28/2014 5:40:09 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (We need to fundamentally transform RATs lives for their lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

The US government is a vampire that sucks the blood of hard-working people and companies. The government mainly is worried about their ability to keep the EBT monies flowing and the graft monies flowing...that’s it.


4 posted on 08/28/2014 5:48:41 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s unfortunate that a larger and larger part of the electorate loves Progressives and their message of acquisition by fiat. (Mr. Stalin would be proud.)

IMHO


5 posted on 08/29/2014 4:51:53 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson