Posted on 08/29/2014 1:02:31 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
and... Looks like someone is trying to blame James O’Keefe like they tried to blame Chris Simcox for an islamo terror threat a few years ago.
Yeah, because James ordered BP away from the area so he could selfishly make his self-aggrandizing video. < / s >
I have posted in the past that the bum's rush of the "children" was a perfect opportunity for RP to take (and KEEP) control of the Texas Border.
If IS so much as lights a sparkler on this side of the border that opportunity increases 10x.
If TC is looking at the White House, this would be a BIG plus.
.
Judicial Watch says attack imminent:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/imminent-terrorist-attack-warning-feds-us-border/
Stay armed and ready...
“Re-elect NO ONE.”
It’s the only way.
Our feckless government is not concerned about an attack on the USA by IS. (They dropped the Iraq and Syria from their name because they want to include Lebanon and Jordan in their Islamic State.) But if a few thousand Christian fighters went to protect their fellow believers in Iraq and Syria, every government would spring into action to prevent it. They couldn’t stand that.
Yeah, I thought of the ocean incursion too .. I didn’t connect the boat load the other day .. probably because it was way south of where General Atomics is located. If they were carrying any equipment, they’d have quite a hike to accomplish their plan.
I’m not concerned with the Coast Guard being on alert .. I’m sure they’ve already been notified .. and even more so because of the incursion on the beach further south.
Aside from the obvious concerns ‘most’ of us have with the Cartels operating in Mexico, what gets me is the fact is that they are organized crime and any ‘terrorists’ entering Mexico threaten their operations due to unwanted increased US Federal attention on the area.
It seems to me in the “real” world a Cartel head might be picking up some suitable folk (foreigners in the country illegally of a particular religious origin) and making very, very public examples of them (”Don’t come here/Don’t do that”).
I question the validity of this so-called ‘threat’ (particularly on the ‘southern’ border...seems too obvious & convenient).
With this ‘warning’, I’m looking at Seattle, Chicago, etc...if there’s anything to it at all more than another distraction from ‘The man that wasn’t there’, or ‘Zero goes to Washington’...
Oh...the biggest ‘tell’ this is a sideshow? Using O’Keefe in the report. Hook, line & sinker, from my POV. Almost like the report was intended as a ‘message’ of sorts... Question is: Why so obvious?
Like the southern border hasn’t always been a gateway to the US for decades...for ANYONE.
All the boaters have been arrested.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.