Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA is Building the Largest Rocket of All Time For a 2018 Launch
The Verge ^ | August 31, 2014 | Staff

Posted on 09/01/2014 1:34:40 PM PDT by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

mini-shuttle:

http://www.sncspace.com/ss_space_exploration.php


41 posted on 09/01/2014 3:14:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

SpaceX Falcon Heavy (animation)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX3gk5-Yygw


42 posted on 09/01/2014 3:17:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

We’re sending Michelle Obama into space????


43 posted on 09/01/2014 3:18:15 PM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Well, it really is about spending money, because it doesn’t have a mission (other than to spend money).

I thought its purpose was muslim outreach???


44 posted on 09/01/2014 3:21:14 PM PDT by Joe Bfstplk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I thought Antares was canceled after they spent the budget on paper instead of flight hardware.

/johnny

45 posted on 09/01/2014 3:23:58 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski
No. It's big, loud and ugly, but it's not married to POTUS.

/johnny

46 posted on 09/01/2014 3:25:25 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

It was going strong, but had delays, Obama tried to cancel it as part of the switch to muzzie outreach, congress restored funding; ultimately the program was defunded and cancelled as part of the Obama agenda.


47 posted on 09/01/2014 3:31:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Now that you mention it, I do recall some plans. They weren’t very impressive plans even when they were still active.

Returning to the moon in the 2020s. Really? Mars in the 2030s or 40s. I forget the exact dates.

When he announced them I groaned.

We knew the shuttle was going to phase out decades before it did. Where was the replacement ride when it did?

It has not been 45 years since we landed on the moon.

This is almost Biblical in it’s utter collapse.


48 posted on 09/01/2014 3:34:49 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (We'll know when he's really hit bottom. They'll start referring to him as White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Darteaus94025

IOW, what is printed in that excerpt and what you continue to say are not the same thing. Thanks for clearing it up. The successor program would have replaced the Shuttle for LEO *by now*, and provided it continued in development would be on track (whatever delays etc would have arisen) to return to the Moon. Obama and his fellow ‘rats cancelled it.


49 posted on 09/01/2014 3:35:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“Has now been...”

not

“Has not been...”


50 posted on 09/01/2014 3:35:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (We'll know when he's really hit bottom. They'll start referring to him as White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

That’s some serious heavy lift.


51 posted on 09/01/2014 3:38:38 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

I don’t disagree.


52 posted on 09/01/2014 3:48:02 PM PDT by lbryce (Barack Obama:Misbegotten, Bastard Offspring of Satan and Medusa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
To meet this goal, we will return the Space Shuttle to flight as soon as possible, consistent with safety concerns and the recommendations of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board. The Shuttle's chief purpose over the next several years will be to help finish assembly of the International Space Station. In 2010, the Space Shuttle -- after nearly 30 years of duty -- will be retired from service.

Our second goal is to develop and test a new spacecraft, the Crew Exploration Vehicle, by 2008, and to conduct the first manned mission no later than 2014. The Crew Exploration Vehicle will be capable of ferrying astronauts and scientists to the Space Station after the shuttle is retired. But the main purpose of this spacecraft will be to carry astronauts beyond our orbit to other worlds. This will be the first spacecraft of its kind since the Apollo Command Module.

Our third goal is to return to the moon by 2020, as the launching point for missions beyond. Beginning no later than 2008, we will send a series of robotic missions to the lunar surface to research and prepare for future human exploration. Using the Crew Exploration Vehicle, we will undertake extended human missions to the moon as early as 2015, with the goal of living and working there for increasingly extended periods. Eugene Cernan, who is with us today -- the last man to set foot on the lunar surface -- said this as he left: "We leave as we came, and God willing as we shall return, with peace and hope for all mankind." America will make those words come true. (Applause.)

LINK

I'm not certain Bush even met his own goals. Obama certainly didn't help any, that's for sure.

Obama's only goal has been the next green exploration.

53 posted on 09/01/2014 3:48:20 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (We'll know when he's really hit bottom. They'll start referring to him as White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

Powered by 1000 cattle!


54 posted on 09/01/2014 3:49:37 PM PDT by SgtHooper (Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Leave it to Obama to return even our space program to the 60s.


55 posted on 09/01/2014 4:59:28 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
NASA is not building this rocket. They are only paying for it.

Aerojet - Rocketdyne is building this rocket.

56 posted on 09/01/2014 7:00:12 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

That is the specific terms for liquid oxygen & liquid hydrogen rocket fuel they used on the Shuttle.

It is not pure oxygen and hydrogen. Those 2 are more reactive.

Bad stuff to mess with.


57 posted on 09/01/2014 7:21:43 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson