Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Watch: Documents Reveal State Department Officials Told Three Months before Attack...
Judicial Watch ^ | September 10, 2014

Posted on 09/10/2014 1:48:13 PM PDT by jazusamo

Full title: Judicial Watch: Documents Reveal State Department Officials Told Three Months before Attack that Benghazi Security Guards Abandoning Posts Out of Fear for Safety

Internal email reveals that three months before fatal terrorist attack, an explosion at compound wall “created a fear factor when it came to working the night shift”

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has obtained 130 pages of new State Department documents revealing that local security guards working for Blue Mountain Group (BMG), the firm hired to protect the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi, repeatedly abandoned their posts “out of fear of their safety” in the months leading up to the deadly terrorist attack on the special mission compound.

The documents were obtained by Judicial Watch pursuant to a February 25, 2013, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 13-00243)) seeking the following information:

“Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to the $387,413.68 contract awarded by the Department of State to an unidentified foreign awardee for “Security Guards and Patrol Services.” According to the record of this expenditure on USASpending.gov, the contract was signed on February 17, 2012 and May 3, 2012, and is identified by Award ID SAQMMA12C0092.”

According to the documents, on June 30, 2012, three months before the Benghazi terrorist attack, a Quality Assurance Compliance Report from Blue Mountain Libya to Department of State Contract Specialist Neal Kern warned that the number of local security guards leaving their posts had put the U.S. Benghazi Mission at risk:

Due to the amount of local guard force members leaving out of fear of their safety and the long process to security check individuals, it makes it very difficult to quickly react to a large drop in staff in quick succession as has been occurring with all the incidents especially when additional staff are requested.

The same June 30 report advises that an explosion on the perimeter wall of June 6 had “promoted a fear factor” with a “lasting effect” on the security staff:

On the shift 2200-0600 hours on 11.06.2012 [Redacted] emergency staff did not attend for his shift and gave no prior warning of absence, a replacement was not able to be sourced due to the time of evening and the bank staff members not answering their phones. It is believed that the explosive device set off on the compound perimeter wall had a lasting effect on certain members of the staff; this promoted a fear factor when it came to working the nightshift. [Emphasis added]

Additional emails confirm that in the months leading up to the terrorist attack, State Department officials were repeatedly informed of the Benghazi security staffing problems. A July 2, 2012, memo from David Oliveria, the Temporary Duty Officer in Benghazi at the time, contained the following warning about “manpower issues”:

Per our conversation, the original A&E request for guard service was to run from June 6th to June 18th. Unfortunately, due to manpower issues and unforeseen last minute resignations of BMGs guard staff, US Mission Benghazi were only provided the below guards (see email) through the 12th (starting 11th at 2200).

An additional email from BMG to State Department official Kern reveals that not only was the undermanned Benghazi Mission security staff caused serious dissension among top security staffers there:

Between the 18th – 30th April a Guard Commander was not provided due to the current Guard Commander [REDACTED] being relieved of his position due to an altercation with the NTC/QRF at the US compound. A new Guard Commander has been selected and will begin on the 3rd of May.

On the 22nd April a guard for Shift Charlie [REDACTED] failed to turn up for duty at 2359 hours, we were unable to replace this guard due to [REDACTED] not giving any prior warning that he would not be working. Unfortunately the shift carried out their 8 hour shift with only 4 men.

The documents obtained by Judicial Watch cover the period from March 1 through August 31, 2012. Significantly, no documents were provided by State for the time period in September immediately leading up to the September 11 attack that took the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

“These documents show that the U.S. Special Mission at Benghazi was a sitting duck and that the State Department’s local militia ‘security’ feared for their own safety and wouldn’t even show up to provide necessary protection,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “All security indicators were flashing red and, perhaps, with a show of strength to secure the Benghazi mission, U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods might be alive today. Once again, our independent work continues to shed more light on Benghazi than anything done by the media or Congress.”

In April 2014, Judicial Watch released documents from the State Department revealing that Blue Mountain Group (BMG) had lost at least two previous private security contracts in Tripoli and was hired despite a warning from the Embassy Acting Regional Security Officer. Earlier, on September 14, 2012, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland had emphatically denied that State had hired any private firm to provide security at the American mission in Benghazi. The following week, Nuland was forced to admit that she had made an “error,” saying, “There was a group called Blue Mountain Group … hired to provide local Libyan guards ….” It was those security guards according to the newly released Judicial Watch documents, who apparently abandoned their posts in the weeks leading up to the Benghazi attack.

On April 18, 2014, Judicial Watch obtained a White House email showing then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials attempting to orchestrate a portrayal of the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being “rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.” Judicial Watch’s disclosure of this document led to the House forming a Select Committee to investigate Benghazi.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazicoverup; bluemountain; bmg; guards; hillary; hillarybenghazi; hillaryclinton; lybianguards; obama; statedepartment; victorianuland
State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland had emphatically denied that State had hired any private firm to provide security at the American mission in Benghazi.

Victoria Nuland and State play fast and loose with the truth in saying "error," seems to me it was a LIE.

1 posted on 09/10/2014 1:48:13 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Did Ambassador Steven know something and they wanted him dead?


2 posted on 09/10/2014 1:49:47 PM PDT by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

An excellent question that we’ll undoubtedly never get an answer to.


3 posted on 09/10/2014 1:51:35 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The unspoken truth is that every post around the world has security plans. All of them. Where is the State Department’s security plan for Benghazi?
Why wasn’t it implemented?

Why do we have completely unqualified people in the chain of command making security decisions?

It’s bad enough when we have hacks like Hillary as Secretary of State but how can be run our foreign service with incompetents at every level?


4 posted on 09/10/2014 1:59:48 PM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Herridge On Cable Month Before Benghazi Attack: "Smoking Gun Warning Here" 10/31/12

CNN: Protests against film a ‘diversion. Attack was planned’ 9/12/12

Egypt intelligence warns (on Sept 4th) of attacks on Israel, US embassies 9/13/12

Congress was warned about Libya last month 9/13/12

Source: Slain ambassador Stevens said he was on al Qaeda list 9/20/12

WASHINGTON - In the months leading up to his death, Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, worried about constant security threats in Benghazi and mentioned that his name was on an al Qaeda hit list, a source familiar with his thinking told CNN.

5 posted on 09/10/2014 2:04:00 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chainmail

Let’s look at Obama recently. He had not developed a strategy for ISIS. Logic seems to dictate then that a strategy for security had not been developed back in 2012 for Benghazi and probably for most Embassies.

He was strategizing how to make the next putt.


6 posted on 09/10/2014 2:04:45 PM PDT by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The documents obtained by Judicial Watch cover the period from March 1 through August 31, 2012. Significantly, no documents were provided by State for the time period in September immediately leading up to the September 11 attack that took the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

++++

Looks like that pesky IRS virus that eats computer hard drives is also active in Libya.

7 posted on 09/10/2014 2:10:15 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The thing that must be kept in focus is that Obama, Jarrett, Clinton, Panetta, et al were willing to sacrifice all 41 of the Americans stationed that night in Benghazi, in the embassy and the CIA Annex.

All 41 were in mortal danger after the initial plan, whatever it was(possibly allowing Stevens to be captured as a hostage) went south in a big way.

No one lifted a findger in the White House to get military help to our Ambassador and the CIA personnel, who were under attck for 13 Hours.

Let that sink in—13 Hours!

And they look us in the face and say that they had no assets to bring to bear in all that time?

Plus our so called CINC was missing in action INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE!

So, what was he doing that was more important than watching live video and audio of our Embassy being attacked and our people being killed?

That is criminal, treasonous and impeachable.

See my tagline—Eric Nordstrom testified to this statement almost 2 years ago, and it has now become evident to many more people.

The Taliban is indeed inside the building.


8 posted on 09/10/2014 2:14:38 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Yep, some of States computers are still probably crashing.

It’ll be interesting to see if Trey Gowdy’s Benghazi investigation comes up with less, the same or more info from State.


9 posted on 09/10/2014 2:16:59 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exit82
That is criminal, treasonous and impeachable.

Amen...Worth repeating.

10 posted on 09/10/2014 2:21:10 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

At one point State Department requisition for guards in Benghazi actually did include acfirmative action guidelines calling for the preferential hiring of homosexual Arab speakers.

that sounds like a joke but I’m completely serious.


11 posted on 09/10/2014 2:50:32 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

I believe it. The way this pathetic administration has pushed the homosexual agenda and other social experiments with the military I’d rule out no depravity they’d push for.


12 posted on 09/10/2014 2:57:10 PM PDT by jazusamo (Sometimes I think that this is an era when sanity has become controversial: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: exit82

bttt


13 posted on 09/10/2014 3:10:58 PM PDT by Pagey (HELL is The 2nd Term of a POTUS who uses the terms “social justice” and “fair distribution".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson