Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin: "A Revolt Going On With Top Generals And Obama"
RealClearPolitics ^ | September 17, 2014 | RealClearPolitics

Posted on 09/17/2014 8:02:28 PM PDT by i88schwartz

MARK LEVIN: This is very odd. I just want to point this out. You actually have a revolt going on with the top generals and Obama. I'm talking about tanks pulling up to the White House and so forth. These men are trying to communicate to the American people that they are military men and we cannot defeat this enemy unless we use all of our armed forces and armed services. That's number one. Number two, Obama does not view this as a military action. He keeps telling us it's not a war, it's not a war. For him, the truth is it's about politics. It's about containing this issue politically for him so he can focus on fundamentally transforming America. And this is a very serious matter to understand.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; generals; isil; isis; levin; marklevin; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: i88schwartz

This is bs. No general or admiral will resign. Not over this or anything. Nobody did during benghazi or any other conflict where orders were given that were insane and got troops killed. They are lifetime bureaucrats with an eye on government retirement and lucrative defense contractor jobs. They are not to be trusted. Not one single one.

I hope true leaders emerge, but there aren’t any available today.


81 posted on 09/18/2014 2:19:33 AM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

IIRC, the Clown began purging generals and other top leaders from almost the beginning. Keeping Gates as SecDef on was a cover for all the wipeouts going on under the radar.


82 posted on 09/18/2014 2:42:04 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sun
Trouble is, two-thirds majority in the Senate are needed to REMOVE a POTUS.

You wouldn't even get two-thirds of the Republicans in the Senate to vote to convict, let alone two-thirds of the entire Senate.

When the Constitution doesn't work any more, you have to revert to the Declaration of Independence.

83 posted on 09/18/2014 2:48:35 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

LIKE


84 posted on 09/18/2014 3:03:26 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

It is not how we did things when we had a constitutional republic. But, increasingly, it seems we do not have that.


85 posted on 09/18/2014 4:00:34 AM PDT by RoadGumby (This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

The Saudis are our greatest enemy. They have flooded virtually all institutions with money. They have owned every President starting with Carter, and probably excluding Reagan. They ran 9/11, and Bush protected them. Note how the Bushes and Clintons closed ranks as soon as Bill Clinton vacated the White House. They are all Saudi property.

Of course, Obama is an agent of the Saudis, and he’s not even a U.S. citizen—UNLESS his father is Frank Marshall Davis.

John Roberts adopted two children illegally from Ireland. He flopped on Obamacare because he was threatened with a campaign to expose him and have his children taken away. The Court will do nothing to save us from a Saudi-run Presidency.

The goal of American foreign policy in the Middle East starting with Carter is to remove secular governments and clear the way for the Caliphate. The Shah, Saddam, Mubarak, Ghaddafi, Assad, all must go.


86 posted on 09/18/2014 4:12:53 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

“The Congress can grow a pair, and remove his ass from office”

And , just WHO would enforce his removal? Holder? Now, THAT is a laugh.


87 posted on 09/18/2014 4:19:39 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
As much as I can not stand the bastard, tanks pulling up to the White House is NOT how we do things.

Attitudes like yours explain how criminals like Obama succeed.

Obama is an agent of the Saudis. He's an illegal alien. Congress is owned by the Saudis. All the "prestige" universities have been purchased by the Saudis. John Roberts adopted two Irish children (illegal), and is completely under the control of the Left/Saudis. No doubt the rest of the Supreme Court are either Leftist or blackmailed.

Prissy insistence on "the rules," AFTER the other guy has overturned the game board, is not admirable.

88 posted on 09/18/2014 4:28:23 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Everything the dope-smoking Left said about LBJ was true.

They didn’t know, but he murdered JFK. (Who stole the 1960 election, so he got what he deserved.)

LBJ and Lady Bird made tens of millions on the Vietnam war. Huge investments and bribes from the military-industrial complex.


89 posted on 09/18/2014 4:39:02 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

-— As much as I can not stand the bastard, tanks pulling up to the White House is NOT how we do things. -—

Knowing Mark, I’m assuming that he was speaking figuratively. If so, it’s good to hear that the generals are standing up to Zippy. So far, all I’ve noticed is capitulation, and those annoying PC ads for the Navy.

“Today’s Navy, collecting garbage dumped in today’s oceans, for tomorrow’s future.”

/s


90 posted on 09/18/2014 4:54:29 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Of course, nobody would be so stupid as to put an illegal alien Muslim terrorist in the White House if he had not already bought off the Congress and the Supreme Court.

People who insist on following “the rules,” AFTER the revolution has already taken place, are just enablers of the revolutionaries. They are too fearful to face the truth.

Remember “The Day After,” the anti-Reagan propaganda film the Commies put on in, IIRC, 1986? The missiles have all been launched (and the Soviet missiles are on the way), and the mother goes to the bedroom and starts making the beds.


91 posted on 09/18/2014 4:56:59 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

living in an idealized rut is the problem.

apathy is a losing condition


92 posted on 09/18/2014 4:58:46 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12 ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

A voice of sanity! Thanks for posting that. The very worst thing that could happen is for the military to inject themselves. Youre right about Congress. Theres a remedy for that too...vote them all out. Oh my, that would take an electorate that was awake and engaged. We’re just not to that point yet....


93 posted on 09/18/2014 5:12:24 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine

Marines have always gotten the short end on equipment. It sickened me to hear that the Army has better helmets. You guys rock! The Few and the Proud need the BEST equipment.

Regardless ... you know darn well that the US military could roll over these police forces like a hot knife through butter if enough officers agree on a clear and present danger. And frankly, I don’t see the police being eager to defend this regime.

The only thing saving Obama from such a fate is his term limit. Thank God for that! But if he disenfranchizes voters fast enough with foreign votes and terrorist imports ...?


U.N. to dump flood of Muslim refugees on U.S.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3205136/posts?page=1

“With millions of Christians expelled, ethnically cleansed or worse from the Middle East you might think these were the refugees the US would welcome to our shores. You’d be wrong. Obama has opened the gates to a flood of terror-linked Muslim immigrants, the size of which will ensure poor vetting of backgrounds.”


Only our fighting force’s sense of honor stands in the way of toppling our republic. Semper Fi.


94 posted on 09/18/2014 5:17:17 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Powerless? Not with the Liberty Amendments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz; Jet Jaguar

It is the sworn duty of any of our military to answer honestly when asked a question by our legislative branch of government. They do not serve to support any president. They serve to support the constitution of the USA.

It is not their ethical duty to give a political answer to a question dealing with their specialty, war and the military. Their duty is to provide their best expert information and opinion.


95 posted on 09/18/2014 5:24:12 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox

Sulla destroyed Rome’s faith in a republic that was even more corrupt than ours. Rome had brazen assassinations, they had murderous mobs chasing and killing politicians who had to flee from their own homes.

We are on the razor’s edge right now, so I understand your point of view:

‘“Tanks pulling up to the White House” is a perfectly acceptable alternative in the correct circumstances, IMO.’

Yes, it would be if our vote was overly-neutralized or if too many enemies were welcomed inside our border. The only question is — where’s the breaking point? Some would say that a single illegal immigrant suddenly having a vote. Others would say more. Some would say ‘Fast and Furious’ is good enough reason, or Ben Ghazi [sic].

One thing is clear — you would need a strong consensus among US officers. To reach that, you would risk a large-scale court martial. Obama would love that. So unless there is a sudden flash of fresh outrage, it vould be counter-productive.

Antoher thing is clear as well — voters should NEVER foist another creep on the US military. It’s DANGEROUS.


96 posted on 09/18/2014 5:27:07 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Powerless? Not with the Liberty Amendments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: 556x45

Military coups and revolutions don’t have a very good historical track record. Very RARE for a ‘Washington’ to end up in charge. MUCH more often people end up with a ‘Hitler’ or ‘Stalin’. Is that something we want to so quickly put a test here again? If things indeed get bad enough, SURE; but we aren’t at that point, YET.(IMHO)


97 posted on 09/18/2014 5:34:49 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

An inadequate force will sustain more casualties.


98 posted on 09/18/2014 6:05:11 AM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

“Very RARE for a ‘Washington’ to end up in charge. MUCH more often people end up with a ‘Hitler’ or ‘Stalin’.”

Correct! But we are getting very close to a breaking point — immigration, leftists in the supreme court ... Just imagine if our supreme court lost just one member. It could turn leftist overnight. Then we would no longer have a republic in ANY sense of the word. Or if we were flooded with several million dual-citizenship voters overnight. Or if the lame duck congress were to roll us with more damaging legislation yet. Or martial law after a disaster or terror attack.

We are CLOSE. It was even more dangerous to elect Obama than most people realize. I [and I assume you] and perhaps a hundred thousand others DID know how close a call this would be. In fact, if immigration was his first goal with political capital, we would be completely finished right now.


99 posted on 09/18/2014 6:06:14 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Powerless? Not with the Liberty Amendments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Thanks for the post to the react then think crowd.


100 posted on 09/18/2014 6:40:34 AM PDT by billhilly (Its OK, the left hated Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson