Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I thought you guys might find this interesting
1 posted on 09/18/2014 1:06:28 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RoosterRedux

Keep in mind that jobs created under Obama were actually in spite of Obama. Can you imagine what this table would look like if the U.S. economy weren’t experiencing an oil boom.


2 posted on 09/18/2014 1:07:53 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
Obama has created 100 gazillion jillion jobs! Nobody can find them, but he created them. If you want proof, ask Obama!


3 posted on 09/18/2014 1:08:47 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

The number of “jobs” is meaningless. Replace a full-time job with benefits with three 10 hour a week part time jobs and the number of “jobs” has tripled. The Progressive Era (Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama) has seen the real individual income of paycheck-earning Americans plummet. The unholy alliance of Communists and Corporatists is making this happen and they also define the economic indicators to make it all appear to just be tinfoil hat stuff.


4 posted on 09/18/2014 1:15:58 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyranni)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

But.... But Obama just said the other day that by every measurable metric Americans are better off now than when he took office.

He doesn’t ever even read what they put in front of him before it comes on his teleprompter is my guess.


5 posted on 09/18/2014 1:19:02 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

But But on 9-5-14 Adam Hartung in Forbes said Obama was way better then Reagan. I’m confused do I believe the BLS or Forbes???


6 posted on 09/18/2014 1:23:21 PM PDT by lakeman (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
The impressive numbers shown in the chart during the KKKommie KKKlitoon years were not of his doing. The reality is that Newt Gingrich and his Conservative allies were, for all practical purposes, running things in the 1990s. It was the application of time-proven Conservative economic principles of the free market that allowed for American prosperity to occur along with jobs. KKKlintoon was just a bystander, occupied with other things such as Monica Lewinsky and setting the wheels in motion for the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

American Patriot Draft-dodging kkkommie

7 posted on 09/18/2014 1:24:06 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Carter created 10 million jobs? LOL!


9 posted on 09/18/2014 1:48:51 PM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Take a look at Bush’s numbers again. In his first time there was a net loss of jobs. His second term they were as anemic as Obama’s.

Take a look at Clinton’s numbers for reference. 11 million his second term, to Bush’s net loss in his first term.

The average figure of jobs created per term for the prior 40 years was over 9%. Under Bush it went negative for the first time in forty years.

Clinton’s numbers look a whole lot better than they would have otherwise, because Congress went to Newt in January 1995.


10 posted on 09/18/2014 1:51:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama and the Left are maggots feeding off the flesh of the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Put aside who is at fault — this chart shows the incredible disaster the last 15 years have been. Bush’s and Obama’s was horrible.


12 posted on 09/18/2014 2:00:09 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux
The startling thing is that since 2001 we have added around 2 million jobs but we have added around 30 million people.

That is scary.

There are legions of people in the U.S. who think it is normal not to work. At the same time there are legions of people who think it is normal to work 60 hours a week or work 2 jobs. Neither are normal or healthy in the long term for a society.

13 posted on 09/18/2014 2:13:28 PM PDT by nitzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

Didn’t realize job growth under Bush was so piss poor....


14 posted on 09/18/2014 2:20:56 PM PDT by 12th_Monkey (One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RoosterRedux

U.S. president

Party

Term years

Start jobs

End jobs

Created

Ave annual increase

Barack Obama

D

2009–2013

133,631,000

134,839,000

1,208,000

0.23%

George W. Bush

R

2005–2009

132,502,000

133,631,000

1,129,000

0.21%

George W. Bush

R

2001–2005

132,466,000

132,453,000

-13,000

-0.00%

Bill Clinton

D

1997–2001

121,231,000

132,466,000

11,233,000

2.24%

Bill Clinton

D

1993–1997

109,725,000

121,233,000

11,507,000

2.52%

George H. W. Bush

R

1989–1993

107,133,000

109,726,000

2,593,000

0.60%

Ronald Reagan

R

1985–1989

96,353,000

107,133,000

10,780,000

2.69%

Ronald Reagan

R

1981–1985

91,031,000

96,353,000

5,322,000

1.43%

Jimmy Carter

D

1977–1981

80,692,000

91,031,000

10,339,000

3.06%

Nixon/Ford

R

1973–1977

75,620,000

80,692,000

5,072,000

1.64%

Richard Nixon

R

1969–1973

69,438,000

75,620,000

6,182,000

2.16%

Lyndon Johnson

D

1965–1969

59,583,000

69,438,000

9,855,000

3.90%

Kennedy / Johnson

D

1961–1965

53,683,000

59,583,000

5,900,000

2.64%

Dwight Eisenhower

R

1957–1961

52,888,000

53,683,000

795,000

0.37%

Dwight Eisenhower

R

1953–1957

50,145,000

52,888,000

2,743,000

1.34%

Harry Truman

D

1949–1953

44,675,000

50,145,000

5,470,000

2.93%

Roosevelt / Truman

D

1945–1949

41,903,000

44,675,000

2,772,000

1.61%

Franklin Roosevelt

D

1941–1945

34,480,000

41,903,000

7,423,000

5.00%

Franklin Roosevelt

D

1937–1941

31,200,000

34,480,000

3,280,000

2.53% **

Franklin Roosevelt

D

1933–1937

25,700,000

31,200,000

5,500,000

4.97% **

Herbert Hoover

R

1929–1933

32,100,000

25,700,000

-6,400,000

-5.41% **

Calvin Coolidge

R

1925–1929

29,500,000

32,100,000

2,600,000

2.13% **

Harding / Coolidge

R

1921–1925

25,000,000

29,500,000

4,500,000

4.23% **

**Approximate


19 posted on 09/18/2014 8:17:52 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson