Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Lincoln, chief justice says law, not politics, drives Supreme Court’s rulings (John Roberts: NE)
Omaha World-Herald ^ | Friday, September 19, 2014 2:30 PM | Joe Duggan

Posted on 09/20/2014 11:52:06 AM PDT by Olog-hai

While political partisanship flourishes in the halls of Congress, it has no place in the chambers of the U.S. Supreme Court, the chief justice said Friday in remarks to Nebraska law students.

Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. said he worries that the partisan rancor of the age has skewed the public understanding of the court’s role in government. During a 55-­minute talk at the University of Nebraska College of Law, he stressed that the rule of law, rather than politics, drives the court’s decisions.

“We are not Democrats and Republicans in how we go about it,” he told an audience of 500, as estimated by university officials. “In nine years, I’ve never seen any sort of political issue like that arise between us.”

But Roberts said he understands how “an intelligent layperson” might think otherwise when they see the almost strict partisan confirmation votes on “eminently qualified” nominees such as Justice Elena Kagan, the newest member of the court.

He also said justices such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia, approved with unanimous or near-unanimous votes by the U.S. Senate, wouldn’t stand a chance today. …

(Excerpt) Read more at omaha.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: johnroberts; judicialactivism; liberalagenda; scotus; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Ugh, “intelligent layperson”. Thanks for showing us the real John Roberts.
1 posted on 09/20/2014 11:52:06 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

That sounds nice but doesn’t reflect reality. Ginsberg is as political as they come in evaluating the “law”..


2 posted on 09/20/2014 11:54:44 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

I didn’t expect Roberts to be truthful.


3 posted on 09/20/2014 11:56:35 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Federal Judges are overwhelmingly liberal Democrat lawyers.

They are partisan and political.

They do not adhere to the Constitution.

Instead, they use their power to force their ideology on America.

Jefferson warned the country about an out-of-control Judiciary.


4 posted on 09/20/2014 11:56:53 AM PDT by Oak Grove (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If every decision by each justice was based on the Constitution and the “law” then every decision would be unanimous.

It’s obvious that isn’t the way it really works.


5 posted on 09/20/2014 11:59:16 AM PDT by XRdsRev (New Jersey - Crossroads of the American Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
-- I didn't expect Roberts to be truthful. --

Exactly. What do you expect a SC Justice to say? That the Court is political? Ha! Same goes for all the lower courts. The judges all claim to be following the law.

It takes some real effort peel the cover off the charade. The court obtains its legitimacy the same way the political bodies do, by force of violence.

6 posted on 09/20/2014 12:00:30 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
he stressed that the rule of law, rather than politics, drives the court’s decisions.

So Roberts is doing stand up comedy now

7 posted on 09/20/2014 12:00:36 PM PDT by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Let me just vomit now and get it over with. Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg who thinks the Constitution of South Africa is highly preferable to ours. Pleeez! Half of them want to take our guns. Roberts was either bought off or scared off on the Obamacare decision. They are just as corrupt as the Congress at this point.


8 posted on 09/20/2014 12:01:52 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender

I thought the same thing.

Wonder if anybody was rolling in the floor laughing?


9 posted on 09/20/2014 12:02:25 PM PDT by biff (WAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Roberts is in complete denial. Sad.


10 posted on 09/20/2014 12:04:02 PM PDT by mulligan (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“who me?”
Roberts is now tagged as both political and two-faced.
He has no business telling the White House how to make the legislation acceptable. Roberts should resign. He is just another Washington hack.


11 posted on 09/20/2014 12:05:48 PM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama is actually an islamic narco-terrorist. A man of weakness, not of peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
In Lincoln, chief justice says law, not politics, drives Supreme Court’s rulings (John Roberts: NE)

ROTFLOL

Tagline.

12 posted on 09/20/2014 12:06:17 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Roberts’ Obamacare ruling was one of the most political rulings in the history of the institution, and largely by his own admission. He was set to vote it down on the law, but he didn’t want to “tarnish” the legacy of the court, so he crafted a ruling that would allow him to uphold the law without voicing his support for it. That’s the definition of political behavior.


13 posted on 09/20/2014 12:07:48 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
That's a little naive, dontcha think? For example, income tax is clearly unconstitutional. It violates everything from the Fifth Amendment to the Thirteenth. Yet what Supreme Court is ever going to strike it down? It would result in the economic collapse of the United States.

Similarly, a military draft is a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment in that it constitutes involuntary servitude. But in the event of a war, does anyone seriously think the Supreme Court is going to exclude one of the mechanisms for populating our military?

And let's look at this idiotic "separation of church and state" principle. Do you think anything but a Liberal court would interpret "So help me God" in a pledge as violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?

The Court may not be strictly Democrat and Republican, but it is undeniably Liberal and Conservative.

14 posted on 09/20/2014 12:08:41 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Uh-huh....

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah...

Uh-huh....

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah...

Uh-huh.....
15 posted on 09/20/2014 12:09:17 PM PDT by 98ZJ USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
But Roberts said he understands how “an intelligent layperson” might think otherwise.

Still trying to justify his blackmailed assisted vote for Obamacare.............It ain't gonna work John-Boy.

16 posted on 09/20/2014 12:12:28 PM PDT by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
he stressed that the rule of law, rather than politics, drives the court’s decisions.

bullshit
17 posted on 09/20/2014 12:12:54 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biff
Wonder if anybody was rolling in the floor laughing?

More like rolling their eyes at the ceiling and facepalming. It's too hard to laugh without getting violently ill anymore. That whole article is one non-sequitur after another.
18 posted on 09/20/2014 12:13:39 PM PDT by 98ZJ USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Shut up and “tax”, Mr. Chief Justice.


19 posted on 09/20/2014 12:14:18 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XRdsRev
If every decision by each justice was based on the Constitution and the “law” then every decision would be unanimous.

Indeed. But the Supreme Court has gone from being the intepreter of the law to being the primary driving force for changes in the law.

20 posted on 09/20/2014 12:15:39 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson