Posted on 09/20/2014 7:27:13 PM PDT by Lorianne
The only good mooselimb is a dead mooselimb.
SHOCKING!!!!!!! what is shocking is the media making it seem as though this is not the truth. suck a##es siding with the head loppers
Absolutely. It takes great bravery to voluntarily march off to war. But what surprises me about people is that more people are willing to do that, than are willing to subject themselves to social ostracism.
In this case, she's subjecting herself to much more than social ostracism. Like a soldier, she's putting her life on the line.
That was encouraging. 100% negative. (The comments begin in the third or fourth story down).
On another note, I wonder if the exposure of the "moderate Islam" fraud will finally bring about the rejection of multiculturalism.
Dear SatinDoll,
The man in the image with ol’ Adolf was the Grand Mufti of Egypt (Egypt is not in the Balkans). The Grand Mufti decides the form Islam takes at any given time. He is The Authority. They were probably discussing a book deal, since Mein Kamph took so much from the Qur’an, Hadiths, and Sunnahs - it would look like plagiarism, unless they worked a deal. Mein Kamph remains the number one best seller in the Middle East after the Qur’an.
Fighting for Hitler were several SS brigades from Albania (which is in the Balkans), several legions of Southern Syrians, aka Palestinians {among them was Mohammed Yasser Abdel Rahman Abdel Raouf Arafat al-Qudwa, an Egyptian}, as well as others from all over the Middle East and North Africa.
More of my 2 cents on the situation in general:
There is only one form/philosophy in Islam - that which was dictated to Mohammad. No other. Westerners rave about how wonderful the Qur’an sounds (this is the First Given half of the Qur’an), but the ignore or are ignorant of the command by Mohammad that only the Second Given half of the Qur’an is valid, as they were the last words of Allah.
You will find that the word ‘love’ is mentioned once in the First half and not at all in the Second half. You will find plentiful mention of the word ‘kill’ and other similar references in the Second half. If you have not read Talibari, Muslim, Isaq and Bukhari (the Hadiths and Sunnahs), you cannot understand the Qur’an, as among other issues, the First and Second halves are not linear, but intermixed.
If a person is born into a Muslim country, he is automatically a Muslim; if that person (or a convert) does not follow Mohammad’s Second Given half, they are an apostate. Moderation is forbidden - if a Muslim contradicts Mohammad or the words of Allah (a person professing to moderate Islam), he is an apostate - ‘moderates’ are apostates. All Muslims are obliged to kill apostates.
Westerners seem to believe Islamic Taqiyya: that Islam is a different form of Christianity. It is not. It is the antithesis. Mohammad’s motto was “Kill, kill, kill”. Christ’s motto, if He were to have one, might be “Love thy neighbor”. Good Muslims kill their neighbor - one who does not follow Mohammad, is a person of the Book, a Hindu, follows any other pagan religion, or has none at all. All the silent ones, the proverbial ‘moderate Muslims’, are either giving support to the warriors (jihadis), practicing Taqiyya, or ignorant of their own religion.
Side Notes:
1) The Qur’an was first written 200 years after the assassination (ascension) of Mohammad; it was compiled from various wall-hangings, tapestries, scrapes of paper, etc. It was not written during the previous centuries - the Muslims were too busy killing and enslaving countless millions, destroying the civilizations in North Africa, the Middle East, and Persia.
2) Islam does not have the concepts of free will, freedom of speech, or freedom of any kind. Allah dictates everything down to the subatomic level. Thus, “Insha’Allah” - “If Allah wills”.
3) The popular misconception of jihadis getting 72 virgins in Paradise is actually a mistranslation of the old Syriac word for white raisins - a very valuable commodity in Mohammad’s time.
Any campaign to educate LIVs and the West in general of the true nature and meaning of Islam is welcomed indeed. This is not a matter of being anti-religious, racist (as Arabs believe they are the Master race), it is a matter of survival - personal and of Western civilization. It is a matter of naming the enemy without equivocation.
It is a war to the death, which cannot be won unless Islam is eradicated, unless the West is willing to fight without ROEs - there are no innocent civilians in war - you are either on one side or the other.
If you are not willing to be more brutal than the enemy, you will lose the war. If one imagines one’s self morally above such brutality, then others will die in your name and eventually you will die, headless, at the hands of the enemy.
There is no such thing as ‘getting along’ or ‘coexisting’ with Islam - jihadis will kill you just the same. Them or you - pick one. Fighting a “kinder, gentler war” is to demonstrate weakness and hand Islam victory.
The war ends when the last person willing to die for their side is dead. All other outcomes are only temporary - as Mohammad and Allah spoke.
Watch the American Left embrace Hitler. He’s one of their own anyway.
Holder and obammy will find a way to quash this ad campaign soon.
No I did not. I am implying that there are a lot of people out there on both political sides that have been trying very hard since Libya to get us involved in another ground war. They keep trying and the American citizens keep saying no.
Now they are upping the game. Not Gellar .... other forces.
Geller’s material is just going to help them.
I have NO OBJECTION to the material itself. It’s the timing of allowing it to be widely diseminated that is of concern to me. I want to know why now?
It is a message that needed to get out, and Geller has a right to have had her point of view heard since way back .... but this has been the case for over 13 years.
Why now is it being allowed?
That is my question.
Because Zero Hedge put that in their title, not me.
No
I think its the opposite. They may make a show of doing that, but I think this suits their immediate purposes just fine.
"Hey 'Civ, why do you keep saying that ZeroHedge and 'Tyler Durden' should be banned from FR?"In a move that is certain to further escalate already stretched racial tensions... anti-Islamic posters which feature photos of an ISIS beheading victim... declare "Yesterday's moderate [Muslim] is today's headline" and proclaim "It's not Islamophobia, it's Islamorealism" ...paid for by flame-throwing blogger Pamela Geller, at a cost of $100,000, are intended as an “education campaign” to warn of the “problem with jihad” and Islamic sharia law, Geller said.Seriously, get Zero Hedge the intercourse out of here, now.
ZeroHedge is doing that because ZeroHedge pushes foreign-sourced agitprop, and is about as reliable as Alex Jones.
Well put.
Well put.
I really worry about her safety..
After firing, she should have been strung up with piano wire. Of course, I mean that in the nicest possible way.
/bingo
Well said, and I’d add, Zero and his cadre insist that ISIS isn’t Islamic, that if ISIS *were* Islamic they wouldn’t have killed muzzies (that ridiculous statement is grounds for impeachment for sheer incompetence, not to mention baldfaced lying). Pamela Geller doesn’t.
But of course, there will always be dhimmi around who claim that, if the US didn’t (fill in the blank) or hadn’t (fill in the blank), 9/11 wouldn’t have happened, or the Boston bombings or Fort Hood wouldn’t have taken place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.