I doubt it
Posted on 09/25/2014 7:24:59 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
For most of his six years as president, Barack Obama has behaved as if the U.S. could opt out of the war Islamist terrorists have been waging on it and to pretend that outreach or the magic of his personality could bridge the gap with the Muslim and Arab worlds. But in his speech today to the United Nations General Assembly, the president seem to find a new, tougher, and more realistic voice about this threat. Instead of pious liberal platitudes at times he sounded like the grown up America needs at its helm. While the change is heartening, it remains to be seen if the means he is rallying to meet the threat is equal to the challenge he outlined.
The contrast between Obama’s speech today and previous statements, such as his June 2009 address to the Arab and Muslim worlds in Cairo, Egypt was stark. Rather than placing the blame for conflicts on the West and, in particular, the United States, Obama seems finally to have woken up to the fact that engagement won’t make radical Islam go away. In its place, the president spoke up forcefully in recognition of the fact that there is no alternative to the use of force against radical Islamists such as the al-Qaeda affiliates and the ISIS group running amok in Syria and Iraq:
No God condones this terror. No grievance justifies these actions. There can be no reasoning – no negotiation – with this brand of evil. The only language understood by killers like this is the language of force. So the United States of America will work with a broad coalition to dismantle this network of death.
Even more importantly, he recognized that the foundation of any effort to deal with these terrorists must come from recognition by Muslims and Arabs to clean up their own house:
It is time for the world – especially Muslim communities – to explicitly, forcefully, and consistently reject the ideology of al Qaeda and ISIL.
It is the task of all great religions to accommodate devout faith with a modern, multicultural world. No children – anywhere – should be educated to hate other people. There should be no more tolerance of so-called clerics who call upon people to harm innocents because they are Jewish, Christian or Muslim. It is time for a new compact among the civilized peoples of this world to eradicate war at its most fundamental source: the corruption of young minds by violent ideology.
That is exactly right. While in Cairo he pretended that there was no real conflict, now he seems to understand that while this needn’t be a clash of civilizations between the West and the East, the rhetoric of his predecessor about nations having to choose whether they were with the U.S. or not is closer to the mark than the platitudes he used to spout. Having come into office acting as if the commitment of President George W. Bush to fight a war against Islamist terror was a historical mistake that could be redressed by conciliatory speeches and withdrawals of U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama now seems to have learned the error of his ways.
The delusion that the U.S. could bug out of the war in Iraq and ignore the crisis in Syria without cost has been exposed by the rise of ISIS. Though he continues to insist that American ground troops won’t take part in this latest round of a war that began long before he took office, there can at least be no mistaking that the U.S. is back in the fight and understands that this time there can be no premature withdrawals or foolish decisions to opt out of the conflict.
Such tough-minded and more realistic positions also characterized the president’s attitude toward other, not entirely unrelated issues.
On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he stuck to his belief in a two-state solution and his commitment to making it a reality. But he also finally acknowledged a major truth:
The situation in Iraq, Syria and Libya should cure anyone of the illusion that this conflict is the main source of problems in the region; for far too long, it has been used in part as a way to distract people from problems at home.
While relations remain frosty between Washington and Jerusalem, at long last, with this speech, the administration seems to have rid itself of the delusion that pressuring Israel into territorial concessions would solve all the problems of the Middle East.
Also to his credit, the new hard line from Obama was not limited to the Middle East. His rhetoric about Russian aggression against Ukraine was equally tough and left no room for doubt that the United States supports Kiev against the Putin regime’s provocations and will stand by its NATO allies in Eastern Europe.
And though the president has repeatedly weakened the West’s position in negotiations over the threat from Iran’s nuclear program, here, too, he was at least ready to again demand that Tehran commit to a process that will make the realization of their ambitions impossible.
Leaving aside recriminations about all the mistakes that preceded this moment, it must be acknowledged that the president has gone a long way toward correcting some, though not all, of his most egregious foreign-policy errors. But the problem is that it will take more than rhetoric to address these challenges.
Without adequate resources, American military efforts in Iraq and Syria are bound to fail. Nor can we, if we really believe that ISIS and other al-Qaeda affiliates are a genuine threat to U.S. security, rely entirely on local Arab forces to do a job they have proved unable to do for years. As our Max Boot wrote earlier today, America can’t bomb its way out of this problem.
Nor can the challenges from Iran and its terrorist allies waging war against Israel be met with only words. The same is true for the effort to halt Russia’s campaign to resurrect the old tsarist and Soviet empires. Without military aid to Ukraine and similar efforts to bolster the Baltic states and Poland, Vladimir Putin will dismiss the president’s speech as empty bombast.
By giving a speech that included major elements that often sounded like those given by his predecessor, the president turned a corner today in a speech that seemed to embody his transformation from a man lost in his own delusions and ego to one who knew he was the leader of a nation embroiled in a generations-long war not of its own choosing. But in the coming weeks and months and the last two years of his presidency, he will have to match his actions to the fine rhetoric we heard today. Based on his past history, it is impossible to be optimistic about Obama’s ability to meet that challenge. Throughout his address, the president seemed to be drowning in multilateral platitudes and the kind of liberal patent nostrums that have helped bring us to this terrible moment in history. But at least for a few minutes on the UN podium, the president gave us the impression that he understands the large gap between the illusions that helped elect him president and the harsh reality in which the nation now finds itself.
The guy picks apart the prompter reader's words from yesterday as if they are substantive.
Only two comments on the magazine’s web site, but they are golden.
MARC SALZBERGER says:
September 24, 2014 at 2:40 pm
I don’t believe people, especially not ideologues, flip over and away from their consistent positions, so easily.
Obama is facing a national elections with collapsing poll numbers, directly linked to his flaccid foreign policy.
That stiff UN speech is sure to raise his standing, as well as Democratic chances this November. America’s center and right will be pleased, and the Left will still stick loyally.
This is consistent with Obama ever putting his personal standing and political condition over every other consideration.
In 2008, with the surge succeeding and McCain coming on strong, he wiped the foreign policy egg off his face by turning around and accusing the GOP of neglecting Afghanistan. He promised to make that the central front in the war on terror and give it all the combat brigade necessary to win.
In short, that congenital dove, was willing to turn Bush’s brushfire into an inferno, where the US had no vital national interests, when his election chances were at stake. He is consistently willing to throw everything and anything under the bus, to serve his personal interests.
ROMAN SZEREMETA says:
September 24, 2014 at 7:13 pm
Hope springs eternal in Jonathon’s breast!
Like the haruspices of Rome he carefully examines the entrails of Obama’s speech seeking clues for a change of heart by the President.
Touching and sad really.
Like Ulysses who had himself lashed to the mast and ordered his men to ignore anything he says, Obama has already bound the US military to the role of spectator so anything he says is meaningless!
Just a bunch of lies and empty words.
Not even in Rev. Wright's church, hypocrite?
Assuming he is intellectually capable, he's far too ideological to change.
No and hell no. The writer should grow up.
everyday the so called establishment media show how their more and more useless, either they proffer up the unedited DNC talking points as journalism or they just don’t get it,
either way, their irrelevant,
Brings up Ferguson in an address to the United Nations. The white s in this country need to apologize to the world. Yes, apologize for what this colored man has done to the United States with his Islamic beliefs.
I agree. He’s trying to save his Democrat controlled Senate, using the only thing he does well, oratory. Hopefully, millions of voters now realize it is just words, again. Still.
The answer to the question is NO. He’s saying what we want to hear. He will soon let up on the bombing, because he doesn’t really want to hurt his true buddies.
You are right, this is humorous at best, a sad cover for “The Won”, at worst.
(hey Jonathan, it’s all an act)
Muslim clerics preach violence against Christians and Jews. Christian clerics do not advocate violence against other religions nor do Jews. What clerics are advocating violence against Muslims? None. Obama masks the insanity of the Muslims by pretending everybody else does it too. Liar.
No. Next question...
Naa.... he’s just posing for the elections in November
They just have "that look" don't they?
obama?... Grown UP???...
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!
This ‘kid’ is what? -53 years old?
He is STILL a spoiled-brat, teenage minded, grown-up-WANNABE.
Ain’t no changing him now.
And the USA will pay for it dearly in years to come.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.