To: GIdget2004
The “independent” was a stalking horse for the Democrat Party, and as little or as much as you may like Pat Roberts, Roberts is about as close to a “conservative” as you are going to get in this race.
Did Karl Rove engineer this potential fiasco?
2 posted on
09/25/2014 8:43:05 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
To: GIdget2004
The independent is a Liberal and even though Roberts is not 100% conservative, he would be better than a Marxist wanna be.
3 posted on
09/25/2014 8:52:14 AM PDT by
ExCTCitizen
(I'm ExCTCitizen and I approve this reply. If it does offend Libs, I'm NOT sorry...)
To: GIdget2004
Hopefully she’ll go back around Nov 1.
4 posted on
09/25/2014 8:54:48 AM PDT by
txhurl
(2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
To: GIdget2004
“snooker” - somehow, some leftist is going to say “that’s racist”.
5 posted on
09/25/2014 8:55:52 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: GIdget2004
No, Pat Roberts isn’t what America needs. But neither is Greg Orman. So please be open and honest with us and not praise an unpraiseworthy candidate. Just admit that he’s the lesser of two evils and leave it at that.
To: GIdget2004
7 posted on
09/25/2014 9:08:05 AM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
To: GIdget2004
I would say ..hold your nose and elect Roberts...he won’t be around much longer either way!!!
16 posted on
09/25/2014 10:05:10 AM PDT by
ontap
To: GIdget2004
Sarah knows the cr@pola the Dims play with these so-called *Independent* candidates. Many of them are funded by Soros groups.
GO, SARAH!!!!
20 posted on
09/25/2014 10:35:16 AM PDT by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson