[C19fan]

Hat tip National Review Online. The next campaign on the ever continuing expansion of those covered by Civil Rights laws has begun. As Steve Sailer now on unz.com has described as World War T.

[C19fan]

Another EEOC lawsuit:

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-25-14d.cfm

[Opinionated Blowhard]

because she did not conform to the employer's gender-based expectations,

Yeah, like "your a man so use the Men's Room."

[Boogieman]

“Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits sex discrimination, including that based on gender stereotyping.”

BS. Nobody in 1964 voted to prohibit “gender stereotyping”, they are just trying to use the courts to get an expanded interpretation of the law to include that without having to pass a new law.

[Bubba_Leroy]

There is a psychiatric disorder called apotemnophilia in which someone has an irrational desire to cut off a perfectly healthy body part.

It is not treated by amputation, unless the body part is genitalia, in which case you are likely to be sued for questioning it.

[Pollster1]

I have known two men who went through that process. Both started out more than a bit weird but functional. Both also became unbearable relatively early in the process. I can completely understand firing someone who is mentally ill, emotionally unstable, and unreasonably demanding, and it has nothing to do with the separate “prejudice” against perversion.

[taxcontrol]

More attacks on the 1st Amendment by the Left. In particular, the right to peacefully assemble.

[I want the USA back]

Anyone who chops off a functioning body part is mentally ill, and the surgeon who does it is unfit to practice medicine.

[DiogenesLamp]

"Sex Discrimination" is not occurring. The Kook is still male. What it feels like calling itself is irrelevant to that fact.

The EEOC needs to be cleaned out of these sort of fools who want to deliberately equate kooks with gender.