Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockitz

Given the prevalence of nosocomial infections both in the U.S. and abroad tells me that HCW are not following infection control protocols, or the protocols are inadequate. “ICU-acquired infection is common and often associated with microbiological isolates of resistant organisms. The potential effects on outcome emphasize the importance of specific measures for infection control in critically ill patients.(JAMA. 1995;274:639-644)”

PPE gives one a false sense of security: that exposure to infectious material or exposing someone else to infectious material can be prevented if one merely wears PPE. Nothing could be further from the truth.
IMHO, PPE is a last resort barrier. The work habits of the HCW are of equal importance: working carefully and cautiously, paying close attention to detail while working, frequent decontamination and complete decontamination prior to removal of the PPE are also critical. It only takes one mistake and the HCW is exposed, unfortunately to a far more virulent nosocomial infection.

Note: The Ebola virus need not be ‘airborne’ for the HCW in Spain to have been contaminated. Fomites on their PPE, inadequate PPE, and exposure while removing contaminated PPE are more likely modes of transmission of the infection.


16 posted on 10/09/2014 6:59:50 PM PDT by RMB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: RMB

http://www.itv.com/news/story/2014-10-12/us-health-worker-contracted-ebola-due-to-breach-in-protocol/

See Friedman quote on Face the Nation.

Further comments?


20 posted on 10/12/2014 10:28:32 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson