[Mears]

bfl

[Dilbert San Diego]

Maybe we should stop being in awe of candidates whom liberals think Republicans should nominate, and instead seek true conservative candidates. And give that conservative our support, and let the chips fall where they may in a general election against Hillary.

[Izzy Dunne]

Bob Dole is the man.

[Brother Cracker]

[yetidog]

A new shiny charismatic candidate will beat a conventional and familiar dullard every time...regardless of party label or ideology. That is a major (and simple) reason Republicans are losing at the national level.

[mountainlion]

What an idiot. 0bama greatly underperformed expectations. Carter was a great underperformed. Clinton was a manipulator and not a leader. Let me mention Reid, Pelosi, Dashel, Kennedy, Biden...

[TomGuy]

X "fawningly suggested that Bush is the electable Republican hopeful in the field,"

Many of the propagandist bots do the same. How many articles have we already seen that proclaims: "Only {insert presidential wannabe's name here} can defeat the Democratic candidate."

==

These same kinds of bots show up on FR previous to most elections. They push their propaganda, even to the point of browbeating anyone who posts anything on opposition.

Then, after the election, they go silent -- until the next election cycle.

[Moonman62]

give corporations cheap labor with an immigration package.

...

Ultimately it’s not about cheap labor. It’s about flooding the country with people who will vote for Big Government and will look the other way when it comes to corruption.

[smoothsailing]

(Why do liberals always feel the need to “help” Republicans out with political advice about who they should nominate? In that spirit, I’ve got a suggestion for them: Howard Dean. 2016 is that guy’s year, man. He’s ready.)

[RetiredArmy]

I ain’t voting for any more Bushes. Four times is enough. Enough crap out of the stinking Bushes.