Posted on 10/13/2014 4:03:58 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
In a new publication, ISIS justifies its kidnapping of women as sex slaves citing Islamic theology, an interpretation that is rejected by the Muslim world at large as a perversion of Islam. "One should remember that enslaving the families of the kuffar -- the infidels -- and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah, or Islamic law," the group says in an online magazine published Sunday. The title of the article sums up the ISIS point of view: "The revival (of) slavery before the Hour," referring to Judgment Day. The fourth edition of the group's English-language digital magazine called "Dabiq" said that female members of the Yazidi sect, an ethnically Kurdish minority living mostly in Iraq, may legitimately be captured and forcibly made concubines or sexual slaves.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
My how very honest of I.S.I.S !
now waiting for N.O.W. to condemn them...
First sentence from CNN makes sure we know this isn’t the “real Islam.”
Do they include such qualifications when running stories for other religions?
But CNN found a Muslim liar to tell them that it isn’t so!
Where are the NOW paratroopers?
Note how CNN goes out of its way to excuse the rest of Islam.
They can’t find any stories of other religions doing the same thing.
So what it all comes down to is they are nothing more than murderous chauvinistic pimp pigs.
Silent.
HOW their families must be cringing. I'm sure those aholes don't give a rat's patookie about their families. Otherwise they would cease and desist...no, they would have never BEGUN this murder-madness.
Having tea at the White House, with Mrs. BigButt, all wearing BLACK slacks and over-the-hips DARK tops to hide their ENORMOUS butts.
I think if one wanted to one would find the actual judgments regulating the practice of slavery in the modern world from a legalistic Islamic perspective. Sunni Islam decides things in a mechanistic, predictable, and internally logical manner. I’m sure the fellows at Al Azhar in Cairo would be able to pronounce definitively. I don’t think they would care to take up the question at the moment though. The preponderance of precedent is likely to force a rather inconvenient result; i.e. ISIS is right.
That's because they cair about us.
The real Islam has been explained by Salman Rushdie.
Its adherents are guided by the “Satanic Verses” a.k.a. the Koran.
Aren’t ALL Muslim actions steered and directed by the Koran?
Then why can they still speak of peaceful muzzies.
In its own way its fascinating how radical Islam manages to enrage everyone simply by taking its own religion at face value. Its not even that they are forcing a simplistic reading of just the Koran. They are taking the entire body of judicial interpretation of Koran, Hadiths, Sunnah, etc. properly supported by judicial precedent in a couple of recognized schools of Sharia. And yet they justify themselves in such a way that its difficult if not impossible for the established religious authorities to refute them in a non-hypocritical manner.
I don’t think this trick can be pulled off in any other religion.
As the saying goes, “It is what it is.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.