Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slings and Arrows

I can’t see any Constitutional justification for a federal law requiring an ultrasound before an abortion.
**********************
Shouldn’t be a question at all ,, without an ultrasound the abortionist 1.) doesn’t know what to charge (based on fetal age) and 2.) may miss a tubal/ectopic pregnancy ... all abortions for those reasons should be preceded by an ultrasound already ... If I was an ambulance chaser I’d be looking for those errors...


10 posted on 10/16/2014 4:50:11 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Neidermeyer

Those are sound medical reasons. They do not, though, reflect a federal or Constitutional interest, since medicine is regulated at the state level.


18 posted on 10/16/2014 6:52:54 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("Country Songs Don't Have Happy Endings" - http://youtu.be/W93nc95j1KY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson