Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pepsionice
Yep, notice too....no one noted any fever with this guy or the sweats. You’d be showing a 103-degree temperature. Bogus story....but it got people scared.

I believe the number is significant of many infected and symptomatic who are not febrile. I think it is as high as 28% according to MSF. Some of the other Freepers have been keeping notes.

Fever is not a necessary symptom on ebola presentation.
37 posted on 10/17/2014 11:34:59 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: PA Engineer

At the end of the two-to-three week period...you become contagious as you show fever (101 or better). No fever, no Ebola.

I would note this odd characteristic which popped up in some discussion yesterday. The survivors of Ebola (more each day) carry an immunity to Ebola. What wasn’t noted early on by the news media is that this immunity is only good for roughly a decade. So, you could catch this a second, third, and even forth time. No one much has talked this angle of the problem.


40 posted on 10/18/2014 12:25:31 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson