I did not make up “thong dress”. It is right there in the original post. You can deny it all you want but the quote isn’t going to vanish from the internet.
You are a complete dullard, aren’t you?
The words “thong” and “dress” are there right next to each other - that is true. But nobody with a modicum of sense thought there is such a thing, or thought Bristol was referring to a certain kind of dress. Sensible people realized she was agitated and jumbled her words.
Then there is you...you seized on “thong dress”, too stupid to understand what happened, too dumb to know there is no such thing, too ignorant to recognize that it made no sense...so you rush to google, type in “thong dress” and bring up pictures of some slut wearing a dress through which you can see her thong. Too idiotic to realize that google was showing you a picture described by using both “thong” and “dress” as in “You can see her thong through her dress” - you blatted away about what you foolishly thought Bristol was wearing - making up your own moronic concept of a “thong dress”.
I tried to clue you in - but you continued in your thick-headed way to insist that because Bristol said the words “thong” and “dress” together, there MUST be such a thing as a “thong dress”.
Maybe you can tell us again that the words are there...we can all laugh at what a lack-wit you are....again.
No, you silly person, you didn’t make up the words “thong” and “dress” - but you did make up some figment in your imagination that if the words are used in sequence, they must be something real and really nasty and whorish, too.
Hey! “bigfoot unicorn”. That ought to keep you busy for a couple of years!