You imagined what a “thong dress” must be, drew conclusions from your silly imaginings, used Google poorly, and condemned someone based on your poor search skills.
You were unable to recognize that the awkward order of the words was evidence of her agitation; not a specific statement about wearing a “thong dress” but an attempt to express her humiliation that while being dragged by her heels in a dress, her thong would be visible to everyone...because she was wearing a thong under her dress (you have made it clear that subtly is lost on you).
Now aren’t you glad I took you by the hand and guided you explicitely through that simple little exercise? Most adults and many children are able to work that out on their own - especially with the very broad hints I was handing you. It take a certain type of person to continue to blunder ahead without an “oops! I guess I missed that”.
You are not motivated by the search for truth in this, but rather your hatred of Bristol and probably the rest of the Palins.
It is ok for you to dislike someone, what is not ok is to make up something like a “thong dress” (Bristol stumbled with her words, you seized upon the stumble to invent something out of your hate-addled mind) to justify your hate. Such a stretch leads me to believe your hatred is irrational.
What kind of a person wears a thong?
I did not make up “thong dress”. It is right there in the original post. You can deny it all you want but the quote isn’t going to vanish from the internet.