Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nervous Tick

Its simple. How far under the traditional 80%, which means accepting 1 in 5 liberal actions, is one willing to go before he becomes the thing he claims he hates?

2 in 5? 3? How far? Because actions have consequences when you liberalize your party.


68 posted on 11/03/2014 6:52:58 PM PST by Norm Lenhart ("Refusing to vote against unprincipled people made Obama President. " - agere_contra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Norm Lenhart

You’re back to fuzzy theory again.

I want to talk tomorrow’s reality. Let’s try again.

Assume you vote in Colorado, as does goldstategop.

For governor (close race). (R) Beauprez? or (D) Hickenlooper? Or none of the above? In his previous term, Hickenlooper advanced a horrid ‘rat agenda, and signed into law major gun control. Are you going to help him continue abusing Coloradans? Or help get rid of him?

For senator (also a close race, your vote counts): Mark Udall, a.k.a. “Mark Uterus” so he can continue to vote for abortions into the fifth trimester of life? Or help end the innocent bloodshed by voting for Cory Gardner (R)?

This is where the rubber meets the road. What are you going to do in THESE ACTUAL RACES? And why? How will not voting advance the conservative cause in THESE RACES?


77 posted on 11/03/2014 7:00:43 PM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed is his demon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson