To: PapaNew
The new law states Arizona may restrict the actions of its employees and use of its financial resources to purposes it deems to be consistent with the U.S. Constitution Actually that should be "inconsistent", Rebecca needs a proof reader.
7 posted on
11/06/2014 3:35:39 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
(It takes a gun to feed a village.)
To: Michael.SF.
Well, SOMEONE needs a proofreader!
9 posted on
11/06/2014 3:38:54 PM PST by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: Michael.SF.
>> The new law states Arizona may restrict the actions of its employees and use of its financial resources to purposes it deems to be consistent with the U.S. Constitution
>
> Actually that should be "inconsistent", Rebecca needs a proof reader. No, that's actually correct; the bold portion is what is being restricted, the second underlined portion is what/how it is being restricted: to purposes it deems to be consistent with the U.S. Constitution
.
11 posted on
11/06/2014 3:39:32 PM PST by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Michael.SF.
I thought that at first, too, but if you re-read it carefully, it is accurate as written:
The new law states Arizona may restrict the actions of its employees and use of its financial resources to purposes it deems to be consistent with the U.S. Constitution
IOW, Arizon may restrict use of its people/money to actions consistent with the US Constitution.
Agreed, it could have been written more clearly.
18 posted on
11/06/2014 4:05:08 PM PST by
piytar
(So....you are saying that Hilllary (and Obola) do not know what the meaning of the word "IS" IS?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson